Login    Register
User Information
Username:
Password:
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Sponsored
Who is online

In total there are 35 users online :: 4 registered, 0 hidden and 31 guests


Most users ever online was 218 on Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:58 pm

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Administrators
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

SD Triple One (SD-111)

Built a combustion cannon? Then post it here! This section is for completed, finished cannons that you have built. Please include pictures and information.
Sponsored 
  • Author
    Message

Unread postAuthor: MountainousDew » Sun May 03, 2009 5:00 pm

Ragnarok wrote:
dudeman508 wrote:Yup, defiantly overkill.

I think you mean definitely, because defiantly means "in a rebellious manner". :wink:


Actually, I think "defiantly" is more appropriate when it comes to the gun...
Very Good Job, and Welcome to Spudfiles.
  • 0

<a href="http://s709.photobucket.com/albums/ww95/JKazkid/?action=view&current=MDSig.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww95/JKazkid/MDSig.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
User avatar
MountainousDew
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:06 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: dudeman508 » Sun May 03, 2009 7:00 pm

Rebellious, destructive overkill
  • 0

User avatar
dudeman508
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:19 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: starman » Sun May 03, 2009 7:37 pm

Way overkill but beautiful work nonetheless! I assume this is a muzzle loaded coaxial design as you don't show much detail of the rear end of the thing. The shoulder mount and all of the sighting and electronics are very well integrated.

I will say this.....it looks really heavy... 8) Any performance video will be appreciated as usual.

Welcome to Spudfiles Tom! Looking forward to more work like this from you.
  • 0

User avatar
starman
Donating Moderator
Donating Moderator
 
Posts: 3041
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:45 am
Location: Simpsonville, SC
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Moonbogg » Sun May 03, 2009 7:47 pm

It looks cool, but its so busy looking it confuses the hell out of me. Good prop work. Is it solid steel? A video would be awesome.
  • 0

User avatar
Moonbogg
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 1375
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
Location: whittier, CA USA
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: mark.f » Sun May 03, 2009 10:18 pm

Amazing. I can't wait to see a video...
  • 0

User avatar
mark.f
Donating Member
Donating Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 21

Unread postAuthor: tom666 » Mon May 04, 2009 7:42 pm

Moonbogg wrote:It looks cool, but its so busy looking it confuses the hell out of me. Good prop work. Is it solid steel? A video would be awesome.


No, its PVC... shoulder mount made from craftwood. There are steel plates around the combustion chamber, for safety.
  • 0


tom666
Private
Private
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:16 am
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: tom666 » Mon May 04, 2009 8:04 pm

starman wrote:Way overkill but beautiful work nonetheless! I assume this is a muzzle loaded coaxial design as you don't show much detail of the rear end of the thing. The shoulder mount and all of the sighting and electronics are very well integrated.

I will say this.....it looks really heavy... 8) Any performance video will be appreciated as usual.

Welcome to Spudfiles Tom! Looking forward to more work like this from you.
  • 0

Last edited by tom666 on Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

tom666
Private
Private
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:16 am
Reputation: 0

Sponsored

Sponsor
 


Unread postAuthor: tom666 » Mon May 04, 2009 10:17 pm

starman wrote:Way overkill but beautiful work nonetheless! I assume this is a muzzle loaded coaxial design as you don't show much detail of the rear end of the thing. The shoulder mount and all of the sighting and electronics are very well integrated.

I will say this.....it looks really heavy... 8) Any performance video will be appreciated as usual.

Welcome to Spudfiles Tom! Looking forward to more work like this from you.



As per the weight of the unit SD-111 8 kg / 17 lbs

FGM-148 Javelin rocket launcher 22.5kg / 49.5 lbs*

*(comparison based on approximate size..., not performance)
  • 0


tom666
Private
Private
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:16 am
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: jackssmirkingrevenge » Mon May 04, 2009 10:47 pm

tom666 wrote:(comparison based on approximate size.., not performance)


I don't think the world is yet ready for a spudgun that can do this :roll: :D
  • 0

User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Donating Member
Donating Member
 
Posts: 24225
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Country: Holy See (Vatican City State) (va)
Reputation: 66

Unread postAuthor: Ragnarok » Mon May 04, 2009 11:01 pm

jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:I don't think the world is yet ready for a spudgun that can do this

Well, crap. There goes my summer project.

That's not too heavy - but it's not exactly light either. 17 lbs is no small amount.
  • 0

Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
Ragnarok
Chief of Staff
Chief of Staff
 
Posts: 5339
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK
Reputation: 8

Unread postAuthor: tom666 » Tue May 05, 2009 3:18 am

Ragnarok wrote:
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:I don't think the world is yet ready for a spudgun that can do this

Well, crap. There goes my summer project.

That's not too heavy - but it's not exactly light either. 17 lbs is no small amount.
  • 0

Last edited by tom666 on Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

tom666
Private
Private
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:16 am
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: tom666 » Tue May 05, 2009 3:33 am

jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:
tom666 wrote:(comparison based on approximate size.., not performance)


I don't think the world is yet ready for a spudgun that can do this :roll: :D
  • 0

Last edited by tom666 on Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

tom666
Private
Private
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:16 am
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Ragnarok » Tue May 05, 2009 3:35 pm

tom666 wrote:You'd better not have kids then, 17 lbs is about the average weight of a 1 year old child.

That's not the point here. 17 lbs would be very light for a pedal bike... but for what this is (which isn't a 1 year old kid), it is on the heavy side.
  • 0

Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
Ragnarok
Chief of Staff
Chief of Staff
 
Posts: 5339
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK
Reputation: 8

Unread postAuthor: Biopyro » Tue May 05, 2009 3:50 pm

I have to ask - what made you join spudfiles and post this now?
  • 0

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
Biopyro
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 656
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:32 am
Location: UK
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: tom666 » Tue May 05, 2009 5:59 pm

Biopyro wrote:I have to ask - what made you join spudfiles and post this now?
  • 0

Last edited by tom666 on Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

tom666
Private
Private
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:16 am
Reputation: 0

PreviousNext

Return to Combustion Cannon Database

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot]

cron
Reputation System ©'