Login    Register
User Information
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Who is online

In total there are 62 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 60 guests

Most users ever online was 218 on Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:58 pm

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

"New" Fuel Has anyone seen / used this?

Post questions and info about combustion (flammable vapor) powered cannons here. This includes discussion about fuels, ratios, ignition systems, safety, and anything else relevant.
  • Author

Unread postAuthor: kjjohn » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:52 pm

Perhaps someone should put it in a vacuum chamber and try to light it, then we will know if it is an oxidizer or not.
  • 0

User avatar
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:54 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: ramses » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:59 pm

jimmy101 wrote:Propylene is a very weak oxidizer and perhaps that is why it has the "oxidizer" label on it.

That's what I was getting at...
  • 0

POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name :D
User avatar
Major General
Major General
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:50 pm
Reputation: 3

Unread postAuthor: metalmeltr » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:14 pm

the way this tank is insrted into the botom of the torch it can not be griped by it's sides, the thing on the bottom is for installing and removing the tank from the quickfire torch, also the threds on the tank only exist on two sides with the other being flattened, think a circle with two oposite sides ground down, this is to allow 1/4 turn intalation and removal in the quickfire torch
  • 0

Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:42 pm
Location: united states
Reputation: 0


Return to Combustion Cannon Discussion

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]

Reputation System ©'