Logo
HomeForumCannonsWikiAlbumArchive
SpudFiles
Users  Rules   Search  Search   Chat  Chat   FAQ  FAQ   Memberlist  Memberlist   How-To  How-To   Other  Other
Register  ::  Log in Private Messages


Random Cannon

Recent topics
» **CONFISCATED** The Intim
by Sean on 07/05/2008 17:11 PM

» first hybrid- a few quest
by burgerace69 on 07/05/2008 16:51 PM

» PVC pressure max
by burgerace69 on 07/05/2008 16:41 PM

» Completed Sniper Rifle
by n-strike on 07/05/2008 16:28 PM

» my 1st Pneumatic!
by FishBoy on 07/05/2008 16:22 PM

» the hybrid "Larda&qu
by SpudFarm on 07/05/2008 15:29 PM

» Semiauto design; piston/h
by SEAKING9006 on 07/05/2008 15:25 PM


Donate

Hi Guest!
As you're not registered, some features could be unavailable. Click here if you want to become a member of SpudFiles
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    

Post new topic  Reply to topic
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 Bad power? « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Spudinator
PostPosted: 08/14/2007 1:17 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Donating Member
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 56
244.09 Spud Bux

Pnuemos are better for smaller heavier projectiles, the higher/longer pressure spike tends to accelerate them much better, Combustions are better for the lighter stuff...


And BP sucks btw, its weak compared to some of my recent testings lol, 'cough' steel BB through 4.5" of cedar/4500 fps 'cough' Razz

But do try to keep solid propellants out of the discussions, the rules here are the same as they were at spudtech, so knock it off
Back to top
frankrede
PostPosted: 08/14/2007 2:49 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sangheili
Lieutenant General

Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 2628
111.57 Spud Bux

Agreed.
My large combustions are great for launching light weight items far but when it comes my smaller combustions, Its hard to launch a bolt slug, then a again its a 3/4" wide bolt, but my pneumatic of equal size will put the bolt through sheetmetal.
Back to top
f.c
PostPosted: 08/14/2007 4:46 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Captain
Captain

Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 341
94.45 Spud Bux

agreed. probably because combustion cannons reach a max pressure of about 80 psi when alot of people use there pneumatics at over 100 psi it makes a big difference.
Back to top
Spudinator
PostPosted: 08/14/2007 15:09 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Donating Member
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 56
244.09 Spud Bux

Standard combustions peak at 40-45 PSI, they work so well for accelerating light projectiles because the gas temp is so high (hotter the gas is the lighter it becomes, which means it flows faster than standard-temp air).
Back to top
spudd
PostPosted: 08/17/2007 9:43 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Private
Private

Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 8
22.93 Spud Bux

oh yeah! i never thought about that!
why do a cannon that runs on expensive gas when you can run it on air.
thanks guys
Back to top
jimmy101
PostPosted: 08/17/2007 19:40 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major General
Major General

Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Posts: 1415
5996.50 Spud Bux

Spudinator wrote:
Standard combustions peak at 40-45 PSI, they work so well for accelerating light projectiles because the gas temp is so high (hotter the gas is the lighter it becomes, which means it flows faster than standard-temp air).

Spudinator, that is the second time you've posted that. It is wrong. Heating a gas in a closed chamber does not make it lighter. Mass is conserved.

Pop Quiz:
Which weighs more, a pound of air at 72F, or a pound of air at 4000F?

Heating a gas will make it flow faster, so you got that part right.

Heating a gas in an open or expandable container will cause it to expand which lowers its density, not its mass or weight
Back to top
frankrede
PostPosted: 08/17/2007 19:43 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sangheili
Lieutenant General

Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 2628
111.57 Spud Bux

jimmy101 wrote:
Spudinator wrote:
Standard combustions peak at 40-45 PSI, they work so well for accelerating light projectiles because the gas temp is so high (hotter the gas is the lighter it becomes, which means it flows faster than standard-temp air).

Spudinator, that is the second time you've posted that. It is wrong. Heating a gas in a closed chamber does not make it lighter. Mass is conserved.

Pop Quiz:
Which weighs more, a pound of air at 72F, or a pound of air at 4000F?

Heating a gas will make it flow faster, so you got that part right.

Heating a gas in an open or expandable container will cause it to expand which lowers its density, not its mass or weight


Pop Quiz: They weigh the same.

Merged:

spudd wrote:
oh yeah! i never thought about that!
why do a cannon that runs on expensive gas when you can run it on air.
thanks guys
Expensive gas? ya 3$ for 200+ shots is killing me. A compressor on the other hand uses electricity, shich costs money/
Back to top
Spudinator
PostPosted: 08/24/2007 23:01 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Donating Member
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 56
244.09 Spud Bux

Meh, kinda what I meant really. Its been a bit since I played with spudguns, so I'm a little rusty in some areas, pardon me.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2

Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


SpudFiles Version 7.0
Template based off DAJ Glass Template by Dustin Baccetti
Photo Album Addon © 2002-2003 by Smartor
Powered by modified phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group