Logo
HomeForumCannonsWikiAlbumArchive
SpudFiles
Users  Rules   Search  Search   Chat  Chat   FAQ  FAQ   Memberlist  Memberlist   How-To  How-To   Other  Other
Register  ::  Log in Private Messages


Random Cannon

Recent topics
» Do not take what you have
by Crna Legija on 02/09/2012 4:13 AM

» Pop off valves
by Major Collins on 02/09/2012 4:10 AM

» First pneumatic... just g
by Crna Legija on 02/09/2012 3:50 AM

» Does a longer barrel add
by Crna Legija on 02/09/2012 3:41 AM

» Spud Gun Fired By Preside
by MrCrowley on 02/09/2012 3:08 AM

» Jake's cave
by jakethebeast on 02/09/2012 0:57 AM

» "Offtopic-posts-topi
by jackssmirkingrevenge on 02/09/2012 0:45 AM


Donate

Hi Guest!
As you're not registered, some features could be unavailable. Click here if you want to become a member of SpudFiles
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    

Post new topic  Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 CO2 or air for rifle « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
joepage2008x2
PostPosted: 03/05/2010 17:09 PM    Post subject: CO2 or air for rifle Reply with quote

Specialist
Specialist

Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
244.93 Spud Bux

Hi, im making a bolt-action or semi-auto air rifle, it will be a stealth rifle that I can take apart and fit into a small case. I will be running it at an operating pressure of around 200-300psi. Most PCP air rifles are air but at 3000psi (dont like these pressures), Its not common to see CO2 powered.

Here is my question, why is co2 uncommon for high power air rifles and is air any benefit to co2?

Another question, what pressure can the average 15 and 22mm copper tube hold?

I will post some pictures of my prototypes in future - probably be bb gun instead of pellets first. I have also invented new type of electric valve - not the same as the daystate rifle valves. Only has 5 moving parts in all rifle- trigger lever, single part in valve, boltaction or semi-auto assembly, pressure reg, pellet. Should be reliable and easy to service.
Back to top
Demon
PostPosted: 03/05/2010 18:20 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Colonel
Colonel

Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 736
1137.83 Spud Bux

Cooper pipe can hold 800 psi, depends on the sizes, search for more information.

300 psi would require a petrol drum sized airtank to work on a pcp airgun
Back to top
Patto
PostPosted: 03/05/2010 19:13 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sergeant
Sergeant

Joined: 20 Jan 2010
Posts: 96
16.65 Spud Bux

you do find c02 air rifles look at the gamo air rifle, 200 shot's off a 88g c02 at 800 fps with some pellets . Hpa will give you better consist. With more power altho the power you get from c02 (850 psi) is nothing to joke about either . With brass / copper make sure you check the rating and search the forum , there are some really good post here about pressure ratings.
Back to top
Crna Legija
PostPosted: 03/05/2010 19:39 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

shots shots shots
Major General

Joined: 20 Jul 2008
Posts: 1915
1664.80 Spud Bux

co2 it more dense than air so it moves slower thus not at powerful.
co2 is around 800-1000 psi and very temperature dependent. hot days you have more power than cold days.
also if you have a pcp pump you get free 3000psi, co2 you have to pay for

this will help you with you copper pipe

if you unsure fill you gun will water all the way up then pressurize it
Back to top
Hubb
PostPosted: 03/05/2010 20:17 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major General
Major General

Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 2410
701.43 Spud Bux

CO2 is an excellent 'fuel' for high powered homemade launchers. Those high powered air rifles you are referring to, are they spring piston types? If so, they operate differently than a pneumatic air rifle, which would explain why CO2 is not too common.
Back to top
qwerty
PostPosted: 03/06/2010 7:01 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Colonel
Colonel

Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 628
520.78 Spud Bux

Quote:
what pressure can the average 15 and 22mm copper tube hold?


I've had 15mm up to 320psi and i reckon that 500 would be fine.
Back to top
jackssmirkingrevenge
PostPosted: 03/06/2010 7:19 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

aspiring machinist
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 18056
32511.66 Spud Bux

As expressed above, CO2 is denser than air so for the same pressure it will give you a lower velocity than compressed air. It is also much more sensitive to temperature changes than air, so tends to be much less consistent.

As an example, look at the performance of the CO2 and air powered versions of the Condor pneumatic.

Operating at lower pressures will probably give disappointing results in small calibres like 0.177" and 0.22", you might want to consider moving up in calibre like the Quackenbush Outlaw.
Back to top
joepage2008x2
PostPosted: 03/06/2010 13:29 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Specialist
Specialist

Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
244.93 Spud Bux

The gun will be firing .22 pellets - i know that its very hard to get high velocities and a lot of air is used when using .177.

I know CO2 does vary a lot with temperature, I will be using a pressure regulator not straight from the source because I want it to have consistant power levels.
The rifle will have two tanks, the high pressure source and the operating pressure tank. The copper pipe will do for the lower pressure tank.
Im just wondering how much my regulator will go out when under operation because it will cool and may allow more or less pressure to flow.

Gamo are the only common rifles that use co2 that I have come across, I do not have a rifle pump and can only get 400psi from my compressor. There is a scuba diving shop a few miles away so i may be able to get air from them - I dont want to pay a lot of money though.

I really like that condor pneumatic - has far more power than the co2. I live in the uk so can only go up to 12ft/lb, not saying I wont I wont go over Wink The great thing with my design is that I can adjust power electronically. I think I will try co2 first as power levels arnt too high.

My next question is, I will be operating at 300psi, I will be using a silencer, even though these pressures are the same will one need a larger area in the silencer than the other. (larger silencer)
Back to top
Patto
PostPosted: 03/06/2010 18:26 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sergeant
Sergeant

Joined: 20 Jan 2010
Posts: 96
16.65 Spud Bux

Quote:
My next question is, I will be operating at 300psi, I will be using a silencer, even though these pressures are the same will one need a larger area in the silencer than the other. (larger silencer)



huh - ???? Are you talking between c02 and hpa Or pressures?
Back to top
D_Hall
PostPosted: 03/06/2010 18:42 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Donating Member
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 1523
5016.38 Spud Bux

joepage2008x2 wrote:
My next question is, I will be operating at 300psi, I will be using a silencer, even though these pressures are the same will one need a larger area in the silencer than the other. (larger silencer)

A properly sized barrel doesn't require a silencer if all you're pushing is 300 psi. They can be almost arbitrarily quiet.
Back to top
joepage2008x2
PostPosted: 03/07/2010 14:02 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Specialist
Specialist

Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
244.93 Spud Bux

Im talking about air and co2 at 300psi, i was wondering if one would be louder than the other because of the different densities.

My barrel will be between 300-400mm, my last gun that used bb's at 200psi and had a barrel 300mm long - it was noisy. A silencer is a must - suppose I can experiment with different pressures and different sized silencers.

Im half way through my valve - I will post pictures when I have a working prototype. I built a valve before but was from scrap and really inefficient - this one should be great.
Back to top
jackssmirkingrevenge
PostPosted: 03/07/2010 14:30 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

aspiring machinist
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 18056
32511.66 Spud Bux

With a good valve and a relatively short barrel it will be loud, in my experience even a low powered commercially available CO2 pistol tends to be disproportionally noisy compared to much more powerful pneumatics and springers.

Quote:
I can experiment with different pressures and different sized silencers


The rule of thumb here is that there is no substitute for cubic capacity, make it as big as you're comfortable with. Diameter is more relevant that length, a 40mm diameter silencer 100mm long has double the capacity of a 20mm silencer 200mm long.

Quote:
I really like that condor pneumatic - has far more power than the co2.


It's sold in the UK as the Gunpower Stealth, its inline hammer valve makes it one of the most efficient pneumatics on the market.

Quote:
I live in the UK so can only go up to 12ft/lb, not saying I won't go over


Note that UK law explicitly states that an airgun capable of exceeding 12ft/lbs of muzzle energy is an illegal weapon without a FAC - saying that you only use it at lower levels is no defence - so it is still advisable to keep a low profile.
Back to top
joepage2008x2
PostPosted: 03/07/2010 16:43 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Specialist
Specialist

Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
244.93 Spud Bux

I can only test it on air first anyway, I think I will give co2 a miss. I have a springer and its supposed to be one the the quietest rifles - a tx200 airarms (im not too sure). I would like to compare them.

I wonder how efficient my valve might be, It is a new design and never been used (must be some reason).

My rifle will not be capable of powers over 12ft/lb, Im only going to use it for short range hunting. I will get an FAC otherwise. I may just stick to airsoft and be on the safe side, it all depends if this valve works.

The gunpower stealth is just what I want and the price looks ok - maybe a future rifle for me.
Back to top
jackssmirkingrevenge
PostPosted: 03/07/2010 16:48 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

aspiring machinist
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 18056
32511.66 Spud Bux

Quote:
I wonder how efficient my valve might be, It is a new design and never been used (must be some reason).


Care to share the design?

Quote:
My rifle will not be capable of powers over 12ft/lb, Im only going to use it for short range hunting.


Alas, the rules:

Quote:
Discussion of shooting anything at any person and/or animal is prohibited, and may result in a permanent banning of your account.
Back to top
joepage2008x2
PostPosted: 03/07/2010 17:03 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Specialist
Specialist

Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
244.93 Spud Bux

I will share the design if I get it working, shouldnt be too much longer. I posted one on here before but was made from scrap and really inefficient. I managed 5 200psi shots at over 600fps with 300mm barrel from just a 100cc tank at 200psi, 10 shots over 300fps. Im not sure how good this compared to others.

Sorry, it was a long time since I went on this forum and I forgot this rule, I will say target shooting next time.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next

Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


SpudFiles Version 7.0
Template based off DAJ Glass Template by Dustin Baccetti
Photo Album Addon © 2002-2003 by Smartor
Powered by modified phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group