Logo
HomeForumCannonsWikiAlbumArchive
SpudFiles
Users  Rules   Search  Search   Chat  Chat   FAQ  FAQ   Memberlist  Memberlist   How-To  How-To   Other  Other
Register  ::  Log in Private Messages


Random Cannon

Recent topics
» stupid little plinker
by TwitchTheAussie on 12/01/2008 23:29 PM

» good 6mm barrel found at
by Davidvaini on 12/01/2008 23:08 PM

» Metal water bottle thread
by MrCrowley on 12/01/2008 23:02 PM

» X-1.1 Mach speed airsoft
by FordGtMan on 12/01/2008 22:50 PM

» Damage Vid Party!
by Davidvaini on 12/01/2008 22:44 PM

» Brazing kills sharders
by Radiation on 12/01/2008 21:49 PM

» Working on the Eclipse
by Ragnarok on 12/01/2008 21:49 PM


Donate

Hi Guest!
As you're not registered, some features could be unavailable. Click here if you want to become a member of SpudFiles
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    

Post new topic  Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 HEAL 2. Any suggestions? « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Ragnarok
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 12:25 PM    Post subject: HEAL 2. Any suggestions? Reply with quote

Lord of Karma
Lieutenant General

Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2629
7172.77 Spud Bux

OK, it won't be called HEAL 2, but I'm hoping to start building it sometime fairly soon, next couple of weeks most likely.

What I'll be building is the basic single shot configuration, which doesn't differ too much from the tried and tested mechanics of HEAL - and I'll retrofit with semi-auto later.

The design is partly finalised, but I'm still looking for ideas about improvements - I'm not perfect, and I seldom think of everything.

So far, the changes from HEAL boil down to:
> Pilot volume and dead space tightened up, a fairly obvious change to make.
> The main valve has a few dimensions changed to make it more efficent.
> I'm cutting back on hard edges within the internals by altering fittings. The hope is that this will improve internal flow.

Also, it will be a 500 psi cannon, not a 300 psi cannon, at least after I've got the means to reach that pressure Very Happy

I may also at a later date do things like make a lighter piston and improved muzzle attachments (air stripper and "silencer")

There are a few things I'm not going to change, such as the distinctive "S-Kink" in the chamber, even if it doesn't help the performance any - I'm also planning on using the same rough dimensions and calibre.

So, chuck any (sensible) ideas you may have at me, any thoughts about performance tweaks, that sort of thing... even if it relates to something I've already said! You might have a better idea than me. The design is not yet set in stone, and I'm open to suggestions.

In other words, if you could have changed something about HEAL, what would it have been?
Back to top
Carlman
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 12:34 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Aussie
Brigadier General

Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 1171
376.06 Spud Bux

you need a scope Very Happy

that is the only thing i would add to heal really so why not add it to 'heal 2'
Back to top
elitesniper
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 12:56 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brigadier General
Brigadier General

Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 1005
927.71 Spud Bux

haha, glad your making some improvements:D, well more pressure is the only thing i would say, you should also add an oring inside where you breech is. Smile heal jr is also on the way:D
Back to top
judgment_arms
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 13:14 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Judge
Brigadier General

Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 1243
1456.17 Spud Bux

Auto-cocker type mechanism for half-auto capabilities or at least something to automatically open the breach for you.

Also, try to avoid hose-clamps… it’s not the most professional looking. Wink
A nice, full-length wood stock to support the long barrel might help with accuracy.
Back to top
pizlo
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 13:22 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Colonel
Colonel

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 659
951.19 Spud Bux

Onboard Co2? Heal was pretty nice:P
Back to top
rp181
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 13:29 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel

Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 486
104.38 Spud Bux

c02 sucks. i say try to get a nitrogen tank, try scott specelity gasses.
Back to top
MaxuS the 2nd
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 13:29 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Colonel
Colonel

Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 653
827.94 Spud Bux

I think the judge said just about everything that i wanted to say.
Would be good if you had a nice walnut stock or something to go with it. I didn't particularly like the polymorph handle either to be honest..
I think a wooden handle would do the image good.

Why not fit it with a semi-auto system to begin with. It'll save time, money and a pain in the neck when it comes round to it.
Will you need to machine any of these components or is it just 'find what fits'?
Back to top
POLAND_SPUD
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 13:51 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brigadier General
Brigadier General

Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 984
2470.13 Spud Bux

yeah that's it... semi auto from the very begining - if you want to improve HEAL that's all you need

EDIT
iron sights or a reddot sight would be nice too
Back to top
_Fnord
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 14:17 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

reenigne
Major General

Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 1257
1892.97 Spud Bux

The only way I can think to improve it is reduce the total weight and touch up the aesthetics a bit. If you want a performance boost, 500 psi will do it, but other than that I don't think the small tweaks to the pilot and flow coefficient will offer much improvement.

My (predictable)personal thought on metal pneumatics is: If I have to pump up this chamber to xxx psi, why not throw in some propane and get 5 times the power? (Make a hybrid out of it).

I'm not sure if your situation would allow this, but it would probably be worth it if you can. You'd need to do some serious re-designing though.
Back to top
judgment_arms
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 15:11 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Judge
Brigadier General

Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 1243
1456.17 Spud Bux

Instant half-auto:
Palmer’s Pursuit Shop Micro Pro Kit

The stroke is a bit short, but should be fine for marbles and paintballs.

Just have a linkage from your trigger to the four-way, it’ll take a bit to get timing right but once you do you’ll be able to shoot as fast as your pressure reservoir can re-fill.
Back to top
SEAKING9006
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 15:13 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel

Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Posts: 459
741.27 Spud Bux

judgment_arms wrote:
Instant half-auto:
Palmer’s Pursuit Shop Micro Pro Kit

The stroke is a bit short, but should be fine for marbles and paintballs.

Just have a linkage from your trigger to the four-way, it’ll take a bit to get timing right but once you do you’ll be able to shoot as fast as your pressure reservoir can re-fill.



Shocked


Care to fork over the bill-and-a-half it takes to BUY one of those?
Back to top
judgment_arms
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 16:10 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Judge
Brigadier General

Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 1243
1456.17 Spud Bux

SEAKING9006 wrote:
judgment_arms wrote:
Instant half-auto:
Palmer’s Pursuit Shop Micro Pro Kit

The stroke is a bit short, but should be fine for marbles and paintballs.

Just have a linkage from your trigger to the four-way, it’ll take a bit to get timing right but once you do you’ll be able to shoot as fast as your pressure reservoir can re-fill.



Shocked


Care to fork over the bill-and-a-half it takes to BUY one of those?

What? $140u.s.d. plus shipping, considering copper pipe ain’t exactly cheap an additional, $140 bucks ain’t that bad. Wink
Back to top
SEAKING9006
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 16:18 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel

Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Posts: 459
741.27 Spud Bux

Yes, but alot of us don't even have jobs yet!


I've never had that much money at once.
Back to top
MaxuS the 2nd
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 16:47 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Colonel
Colonel

Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 653
827.94 Spud Bux

SEAKING9006 wrote:
I've never had that much money at once.


Haha, just you wait till you hold your first big wad of cash..
Back to top
Ragnarok
PostPosted: 06/28/2008 17:50 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord of Karma
Lieutenant General

Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2629
7172.77 Spud Bux

@Carlman: Way ahead of you there, HEAL has long since had a scope, although it did get nicked for a short while to go on my air rifle (while I sourced a better one): http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb122/RagnarokEOTW/DCP01256.jpg

@elitesniper: I was about to argue against that idea, because there have been problems with it in the past (the breech is specifically designed for high pressure, and most ways to put an O-ring in there would be detrimental).
However, I've just thought of a practical way for it to be done.

@Judge: I'd agree, I'm not a huge fan of the Jubilee clips, but they're hard to get around, because like HEAL, this will be a modular cannon with interchangeable parts, so things have to be firmly held, but also removable.
If you have a good suggestion for another, better looking, way to do that same job, you're doing better than I can.

I like the idea of the stock... although, I'll need to be inventive with it's design.

@Pizlo and rp181: I'm too much of a tightwad to pay for both gas and ammo, especially when I can get air for free, or close to it. Razz

@Maxus: Actually, the staggered building has been the plan for a long time, and it allows me to concentrate on getting each bit right in turn.
I want a breech loader for the cannon anyway, and the parts for it sum to almost no cost at all, a few quid at most, so that's not a problem.

I did have a wooden grip at one point (picture here), but the problem was it wasn't particularly sturdy. The polymorph grip was the solution to that problem, because it was built over a frame of steel rod.

Judge's stock idea might work, but equally, that's more weight, and as Fnord points out, HEAL was heavy enough without that.

@_Fnord: Reducing weight is a little tricky. If I want a copper cannon in that size, the copper is several pounds on it's own, and the additions add up to surprisingly little.

And the tweaks are because I can - why waste performance when I have the means to deal with it?
Anyway, this is primarily a high velocity cannon, and because you lose more efficiency at these speeds, that means I have to fiddle with these things to get the best results.

As for the thoughts on hybrids - I'm a pneumatics guy, through and through. Not to say I never plan to build a hybrid, but for now...
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


SpudFiles Version 7.0
Template based off DAJ Glass Template by Dustin Baccetti
Photo Album Addon © 2002-2003 by Smartor
Powered by modified phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group