| Author |
Message
|
| Heimo |
 Posted: 06/22/2010 14:28 PM Post subject: Hybrid build thread |
 |
|
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Posts: 219
363.59 Spud Bux
|
Greetings
I planned to build a hybrid for a few months now. My first Idea was to create a chamber out of cast Aluminum and I actually made one (the casting failed) anyhow today my dad rudely awakened me cause he wanted me go to the scrap yard with him, (the scrap yard is my favorite shopping store) anyhow I was looking for something completely different when I noticed some hydraulic actuators lying on a heap.
on closer inspection I found a small hydraulic actuator and then an Idea was born. For a mere $4.60 this beauty followed me home.
Sorry I forgot to take pics of me taking it apart
here is a pic showing the length of the chamber
the chamber is 180MM long
Here you can see the ID of the chamber, it measures 40MM ID
Here you can see the outer diameter it measures 75MM
wall thickness is 17,5MM
This is going to be a piston hybrid, I am still designing the piston valve I will definitely swing the Idea here before I make anything.
Will someone please calculate the burst pressure of this thing cause I don't have the faintest Idea how to do it myself, thank you in advance.
I am hoping that I will at least be able to take this thing to 25X
I will update this thread as things develop.
Heimo
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| SpudFarm |
| Posted: 06/22/2010 14:35 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Slow
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 2579
1492.77 Spud Bux
|
Nice find!
I won't get into piston hybrids since I have never made one but you can ask Galfisk.
This is probably very high grade steel, if the walls is as thick as they look like you should probably be fine up to sevral hundres-x as Larda crearly showed us.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Heimo |
| Posted: 08/30/2010 15:48 PM Post subject: |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Posts: 219
363.59 Spud Bux
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kenbo0422 |
| Posted: 08/30/2010 19:46 PM Post subject: |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 201
658.62 Spud Bux
|
| Your pressure vessel looks to be thick enough to withstand 25x easily, if that is steel I'm looking at. Check it for cracks with a good magnifying lens.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Technician1002 |
| Posted: 08/30/2010 20:15 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Senior Technician
Joined: 04 Apr 2009
Posts: 4669
15519.19 Spud Bux
|
If the piston has equal pressure (multi X bar pressure) on both sides before firing, that will be fine by itself. The issue I see is the pilot vent will be unbalanced and may open the piston under pressure before firing.
A slight modification can make the pilot vent balanced too. Put the pilot vent port between the o rings and balance the pressure on the pilot vent. When fired, the main valve and pilot vent opens. Before firing, the piston and pilot vent are balanced.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SpudBlaster15 |
| Posted: 08/30/2010 20:45 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Hybridian
Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 2372
295.89 Spud Bux
|
While this valve will work, the design is very poor, to put it bluntly.
Your piston area ratio is actually lower than 1:1, which means that without 300PSI+ in the pilot chamber, your valve opening pressure will be far less than optimal for even low to moderate mixes.
I'm also very concerned with the cast aluminum valve body. Aluminum castings (Especially those done using a backyard foundry) are very prone to defects, namely trapped gas bubbles, and without proper heat treatment, aren't very strong to begin with. Which alloy did you use, and do you have any plans to artificially age harden it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Technician1002 |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 1:36 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Senior Technician
Joined: 04 Apr 2009
Posts: 4669
15519.19 Spud Bux
|
Just some quick input on Hybrid valves and 1:1 ratio. This isn't as critical as it seems. Due to the mass of the piston, the burn time of the mix, the distance the piston must move before the seal breaks at the port and o rings, the simple time delay of the valve mass may be enough to delay opening a decent burn.
What is the burn time vs opening time?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Crna Legija |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 3:39 AM Post subject: |
|
|
shots shots shots
Joined: 20 Jul 2008
Posts: 1912
1660.53 Spud Bux
|
| kenbo0422 wrote: | | Your pressure vessel looks to be thick enough to withstand 25x easily, if that is steel I'm looking at. Check it for cracks with a good magnifying lens. |
It could take 70x easily if he makes the end cap and barrel holder strong enough, because its made for hydraulics they run at like 2,500psi+
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| spudtyrrant |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 5:25 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Colonel
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 582
959.61 Spud Bux
|
| Technician1002 wrote: | Just some quick input on Hybrid valves and 1:1 ratio. This isn't as critical as it seems. Due to the mass of the piston, the burn time of the mix, the distance the piston must move before the seal breaks at the port and o rings, the simple time delay of the valve mass may be enough to delay opening a decent burn.
What is the burn time vs opening time? | well for my hybrid hgdt predicts it will have burnt out at 14ms, by which time my valve would have been fully open for at least 8ms, so its a little more important than you might think.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Heimo |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 6:52 AM Post subject: |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Posts: 219
363.59 Spud Bux
|
Crap where to start??
| Technician1002 wrote: | If the piston has equal pressure (multi X bar pressure) on both sides before firing, that will be fine by itself. The issue I see is the pilot vent will be unbalanced and may open the piston under pressure before firing.
A slight modification can make the pilot vent balanced too. Put the pilot vent port between the o rings and balance the pressure on the pilot vent. When fired, the main valve and pilot vent opens. Before firing, the piston and pilot vent are balanced. |
the way I planned it, it would have been an isolated pilot to allow me to control the opening pressure by controlling the pilot pressure.
to put the vent hole between the o rings to make it balanced sounds good to me, I will most likely incorporate this into the design. thanks for the advice
| SpudBlaster15 wrote: | While this valve will work, the design is very poor, to put it bluntly.
Your piston area ratio is actually lower than 1:1, which means that without 300PSI+ in the pilot chamber, your valve opening pressure will be far less than optimal for even low to moderate mixes.
I'm also very concerned with the cast aluminum valve body. Aluminum castings (Especially those done using a backyard foundry) are very prone to defects, namely trapped gas bubbles, and without proper heat treatment, aren't very strong to begin with. Which alloy did you use, and do you have any plans to artificially age harden it?
|
like I said I was planning this to be an isolated pilot design.
Yes Aluminum castings (Especially those done using a backyard foundry) are very prone to defects, but that is only because most backyard foundry men don't follow good foundry practice (and I do follow good foundry practice) 1 they don't control their furnace atmosphere and 2 they don't flux nor degas and to show you that this casting don't have absorbed hydrogen(the gas that causes gas bubbles in castings) I took a part of the gating system from this casting that you would most likely find bubbles if you got any absorbed gas, and I cut a section of it and polished it to some degree to show lack of bubbles
as you can see there is no gas in this blind riser meaning it is nice and solid metal. the alloy used, I cannot remember the name of this alloy, but I can tell you that is a alloy that is a bit more malleable than most cast alloys. I am still looking into the artificial age hardening, still looking for a local place to get it done.
besides the most critical parts of this valve is going to be sleeved in seamless hydraulic tubing (shown on concept drawing)
| -_- wrote: |
kenbo0422 wrote:
Your pressure vessel looks to be thick enough to withstand 25x easily, if that is steel I'm looking at. Check it for cracks with a good magnifying lens.
It could take 70x easily if he makes the end cap and barrel holder strong enough, because its made for hydraulics they run at like 2,500psi+ |
pic of the end cap of this chamber
I also just got to add that the cast valve body is 16mm thick at the thinnest point
If you guys still feels that a cast valve body is unsafe or a bad idea, I'll skip the cast valve body and make this a burst disc cannon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kenbo0422 |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 7:42 AM Post subject: |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 201
658.62 Spud Bux
|
| Even with no hardening, the thickness of your aluminum should be plenty. Max pressure under firing conditions shouldn't exceed about 500 psi and aluminum doesn't fail like PVC.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JDP12 |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 8:42 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Major General
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 1872
2217.80 Spud Bux
|
| kenbo... I dunno what mix your thinking of, but a higher mix hybrid (20x or up) is going to generate alot more pressure than 500psi
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Heimo |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 8:52 AM Post subject: |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Posts: 219
363.59 Spud Bux
|
| kenbo0422 wrote: | | Even with no hardening, the thickness of your aluminum should be plenty. Max pressure under firing conditions shouldn't exceed about 500 psi and aluminum doesn't fail like PVC. |
the trouble is that I don't plan on firing this under 25X, only 25X and up to a max of 50X and HGDT gives me a prediction of 84 bar for a max chamber pressure (1 218 psi) so perhaps it would be a safer idea for me to first make a burst disc cannon out of this chamber and skip the cast aluminum on this for a while you guys made me doubt my aluminum casting 
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
52.34 KB |
| Viewed: |
39 Time(s) |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Dave_424 |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 9:08 AM Post subject: |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 220
365.45 Spud Bux
|
If I was you, I would just go with a burst disk design and use the steel chamber. It should be much quicker to build and allow the higher mixes that you were looking for.
Seeing as though the aluminium is the weak part, removing it from the mix will increase your maximum pressures.
I would say that, if there were no defects/cracks in the chamber and the end plates were over engineered enough, it would withstand 50x quite easily
Dave
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kenbo0422 |
| Posted: 08/31/2010 9:20 AM Post subject: |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 201
658.62 Spud Bux
|
Touche.
Here is my version, using the same program (my mistake, 600 psi).
| Description: |
| HGDT info in mostly the same configuration, just a larger barrel and chamber opens right about the 25x pressure. |
|
| Filesize: |
31.82 KB |
| Viewed: |
308 Time(s) |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
