| Author |
Message
|
| UnrealityisReal |
Posted: 02/10/2005 10:52 AM Post subject: MAP Gas |
|
|
Private

Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 12 57.58 Spud Bux
|
| I have a combustion cannon that uses propane and i was interested in upgrading to MAP Gas. Does anyone have any information regarding the safety of this activity, as well as the percentage of gas by volume that should be used? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
| BC Pneumatics |
Posted: 02/10/2005 22:03 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 Donating Moderator

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 1155 2439.97 Spud Bux
|
It shoots farther, but it isnt worth the extra cost, and it smells even worse that propane does! You are much better off with propane.
Also, it is MAPP  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Aaron ????? |
Posted: 05/15/2005 6:15 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Sergeant

Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Posts: 99 259.51 Spud Bux
|
what is mapp gas
does m a p p stand for anything or what |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| yuandrew |
Posted: 08/03/2005 13:58 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 Private First Class

Joined: 03 Aug 2005 Posts: 32 167.58 Spud Bux
|
Mapp Gas- Methyl Acetylene Propadiean Gas
(A mixture of propane and Acetylene) More power than propane but I would only use it in very large guns
I had someone told me he used Mapp gas with Oxygen in a 6" diameter combustion chamber connected to a 1.5" barrel. The potato flies out so fast that it disengrated upon exiting the cannon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| boilingleadbath |
Posted: 08/03/2005 14:57 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 Moderator

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 1647 5491.22 Spud Bux
|
| The aerodynamic forces are smaller than the forces inside a launcher... that potatoe was damaged in the barrel, not the air. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| spudshot |
Posted: 08/03/2005 14:58 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Brigadier General

Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Posts: 1044 41304.56 Spud Bux
|
| yuandrew, that seems like a load of crap to me, oxy and mapp would detonate a 6" PVC chamber, if it is metal i can understand though |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| boilingleadbath |
Posted: 08/03/2005 14:58 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 Moderator

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 1647 5491.22 Spud Bux
|
The aerodynamic forces are smaller than the forces inside a launcher... that potatoe was damaged in the barrel, not the air.
It does result in slightly higher velocities, so if you want to, you can use it. You'll still spend many times more on ammo than fuel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|