Logo
HomeForumCannonsWikiAlbumArchive
SpudFiles
Users  Rules   Search  Search   Chat  Chat   FAQ  FAQ   Memberlist  Memberlist   How-To  How-To   Other  Other
Register  ::  Log in Private Messages


Random Cannon

Recent topics
» How you reckon this will
by Hydra on 12/02/2008 2:21 AM

» We may be on the wrong tr
by starman on 12/02/2008 2:06 AM

» X-1.1 Mach speed airsoft
by POLAND_SPUD on 12/02/2008 1:54 AM

» stupid little plinker
by starman on 12/02/2008 0:20 AM

» good 6mm barrel found at
by Davidvaini on 12/01/2008 23:08 PM

» Metal water bottle thread
by MrCrowley on 12/01/2008 23:02 PM

» Damage Vid Party!
by Davidvaini on 12/01/2008 22:44 PM


Donate

Hi Guest!
As you're not registered, some features could be unavailable. Click here if you want to become a member of SpudFiles
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Oxy/fuel Mixture DDT Runup Distances « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
DYI
PostPosted: 04/22/2008 19:43 PM    Post subject: Oxy/fuel Mixture DDT Runup Distances Reply with quote

Rear Brigadier
Major General

Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 2308
1164.60 Spud Bux

I've got something of a handheld in the works, and I don't want what my username abbreviates to happen yet, so here's the question:

How does oxygen enrichment affect the DDT runup distances of gaseous hydrocarbon mixtures?

We all know that it will be decreased, but to what extent? As far as most of us know, DDT runup distance, assuming perfect mixing, no turbulence, and no restrictions, is about 35 feet in air/propane mixes. It's also been tentatively determined that increasing the mix does have an effect on the runup distance, but not a linear one, due to the decreased burn rates caused by higher preignition pressures.

I suspect that oxygen enrichment will have a much more pronounced effect on the runup distance of the mix, for the reasons of increased burn temperature (and therefore increased burn speed) and the fact that more fuel can be burned with a much lower preignition pressure, decreasing the dampening effect that protects traditional hybrids from detonation. Also, the nitrogen in air acts as a kind of buffer, as it undergoes very little change during the burn, and cannot actually support combustion. While the initially present nitrogen will remain in the chamber, it's percentage will steadily decrease as the mix increases, unlike in traditional air/propane mixes where it remains constant as the mix increases.

I believe that, for these reasons, DDT runup distance will be affected by the amount of fuel being burned much more strongly than a traditional hybrid is, because of the decreasing percentage of buffer gas, as well as the reduction of the preignition pressure dampening effect by a factor of roughly 5. I also believe that the runup distance in atmospheric pressure oxy/propane should be less than 8 feet in a 4" pipe. And if the roughly linear and direct relationship between combustion vessel diameter and DDT runup distance remains the same for oxygen enriched mixtures, this would suggest that the runup distance of oxy/propane in a 2" diameter cylinder is less than 4 feet. The vessel in my design is 27" long, and I'm beginning to suspect that even 2x oxy/propane mixes in it would be unneccesarily dangerous.

The only problem is, sealing becomes rather more difficult with the higher pressures required when using air as an oxidiser, and metering becomes less accurate, since the 0-15psig gauge cannot be used for oxidiser metering. Obviously safety trumps ease of use, but I'm wondering whether the two are indeed mutually exclusive in this situation.

Any thoughts?
Back to top
D_Hall
PostPosted: 04/22/2008 19:45 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Donating Member
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 526
1289.54 Spud Bux

Only comment: Runup distance is also affected by pipe diameter and ignition method so your 35' statement requires some sort of qualification.
Back to top
DYI
PostPosted: 04/22/2008 19:51 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rear Brigadier
Major General

Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 2308
1164.60 Spud Bux

I think I stated this somewhere, but the 35 feet is for 4" diameter pipe. I know I didn't state that the ignition method was a low energy high voltage electric spark, but now I did. This is also the ignition method I intend on using.
Back to top
MrCrowley
PostPosted: 04/22/2008 22:11 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Blizzard of Ozz
<b>Moderator</b>

Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 6187
3319.40 Spud Bux

I don't know a helluva lot 'bout this subject, but you should read this.

I linked it to D_Hall awhile back, I do remember it talking about oxygen mixtures and run-up distances, but I can't remember the scenarios.
Back to top
jimmy101
PostPosted: 04/23/2008 13:04 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major General
Major General

Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Posts: 1776
7533.12 Spud Bux

Wouldn't multiple sparks effectively reduce the chances of DDT? For each spark, and assuming the ammo isn't moving, the effective length of the chamber is reduced. A 40' long chamber with a spark every foot is not going to reach DDT since the chamber burns as if it is only 1' long?
Back to top
DYI
PostPosted: 04/23/2008 17:31 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rear Brigadier
Major General

Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 2308
1164.60 Spud Bux

Quote:
Wouldn't multiple sparks effectively reduce the chances of DDT? For each spark, and assuming the ammo isn't moving, the effective length of the chamber is reduced. A 40' long chamber with a spark every foot is not going to reach DDT since the chamber burns as if it is only 1' long?


That's what I would assume. However, the chamber in question only has one gap. When I said the runup distance was 35', I meant that the flame front had to proceed through 35' of the un-ignited gas mixture before it reached detonation.
Back to top
boilingleadbath
PostPosted: 04/26/2008 14:48 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moderator
<b>Moderator</b>

Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 1647
5491.22 Spud Bux

How much does the lack of nitrogen (or other buffer gas) affect the run-up distance?

A lot. The propane-O2/run-up-distance/spark-ignition/pipe research I remember seeing was indicating one or two pipe diameters for a C3H8-O2 mixture. (centered ignition)

I think. I'd have to check to be sure.
I think I linked to it before. Feel free to search my post history for "O2 run" or something like that...
Back to top
DYI
PostPosted: 04/26/2008 15:58 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rear Brigadier
Major General

Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 2308
1164.60 Spud Bux

Quote:
A lot. The propane-O2/run-up-distance/spark-ignition/pipe research I remember seeing was indicating one or two pipe diameters for a C3H8-O2 mixture. (centered ignition)


Shocked Uh oh... I've been running my 4" x 12" steel hybrid chamber at 3x with oxy/propane, and there's only one ignition point at the back of the chamber. I guess the nitrogen that was already in the chamber saved it from detonating.

I'll be trying the same thing at 4x tomorrow, and if it explodes, we'll have gained some valuable insight. This makes me wonder though, SB15's oxy/MAPP hybrid was a lot longer and skinier than the chamber on my hybrid, and he actually flushed the chamber out with oxygen before shooting. Seems like it should have detonated.
Back to top
_Fnord
PostPosted: 04/26/2008 16:43 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

reenigne
Major General

Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 1257
1892.97 Spud Bux

You'll probably see stress cracks and deformities before it actually "explodes". I doubt there's enough energy density in your chamber to make it go off like a pipe bomb.

Still, I wouldn't want to be standing by it.
Back to top
SpudFarm
PostPosted: 04/26/2008 17:14 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hybrid Guy
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 2097
1187.34 Spud Bux

_Fnord wrote:
You'll probably see stress cracks and deformities before it actually "explodes". I doubt there's enough energy density in your chamber to make it go off like a pipe bomb.

Still, I wouldn't want to be standing by it.


would those cracks be showed if you put 150psi in it and dump the chamber in water?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic

Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


SpudFiles Version 7.0
Template based off DAJ Glass Template by Dustin Baccetti
Photo Album Addon © 2002-2003 by Smartor
Powered by modified phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group