| Author |
Message
|
| squeaks |
Posted: 10/23/2006 9:15 AM Post subject: Piston Speed |
|
|
Captain

Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Posts: 329 466.29 Spud Bux
|
Ok, here's a question I've had for a long time. What is faster, a chamber sealing piston or a barrel sealing piston?
Thanks for the help in advance
Squeaks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
| Hotwired |
Posted: 10/23/2006 12:28 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 UK Spudgunner

Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 1808 3912.38 Spud Bux
|
Piston flies back at the same speed in both cases, a barrel sealing one could be said to have less dead volume between the compressed air and the barrel and so fire a smidgeon faster.
If you're chucking a potato stick the difference of 1/20 of a second is nothing to burst a braincell about.
In fact your reactions are more likely to give a firing time delay than 150psi air expanding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| POS |
Posted: 10/23/2006 12:55 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 Major

Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 395 264.52 Spud Bux
|
| I think a chamber sealing valve is harder to mak though. Try a diafragma valve. That is even quicker, cause the diafragma isn't as heavy as a piston. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| boilingleadbath |
Posted: 10/23/2006 14:53 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 Moderator

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 1647 5491.22 Spud Bux
|
1/20th of a second would be something to worry about, considering that's longer than the projectile spends in the barrel!
However, the time difference between a chamber-sealer and a barrel-sealer of similar porportions is closer to 1/500th of a second. (a barrel-sealer opens in about ~1/300th of a second)
(generaly, we measure these times in milli-seconds; a millisecond is 1/1000th of a second. Using this system, we would say that a chamber-sealer opens 2 ms slower than a barrel sealer, which means it opens in 5 ms [as opposed to 3].) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Hotwired |
Posted: 10/23/2006 17:47 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 UK Spudgunner

Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 1808 3912.38 Spud Bux
|
Ok, fine I haven't looked at GGDT very closely or very much.
I was trying to make a reference to the fact that the time difference between the two valves firing is very small and human reflexes are more likely to make a difference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jrrdw |
Posted: 10/23/2006 18:02 PM Post subject: |
|
|
 Donating Moderator

Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 3284 5123.35 Spud Bux
|
| I know mine is fast enough to keep me working on it! But it's worth it, i got a couple shots off today. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| squeaks |
Posted: 10/23/2006 23:38 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Captain

Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Posts: 329 466.29 Spud Bux
|
| Ok, if barrel sealing valves are a little faster and less complicated why does Joel make his a chamber sealing piston? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| POS |
Posted: 10/24/2006 1:24 AM Post subject: |
|
|
 Major

Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 395 264.52 Spud Bux
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|