Logo
HomeForumCannonsWikiAlbumArchive
SpudFiles
Users  Rules   Search  Search   Chat  Chat   FAQ  FAQ   Memberlist  Memberlist   How-To  How-To   Other  Other
Register  ::  Log in Private Messages


Random Cannon

Recent topics
» 2 questions
by theepicmool on 11/22/2008 16:24 PM

» Who wants cannons in CAD?
by SEAKING9006 on 11/22/2008 15:51 PM

» Cane Gun
by Ragnarok on 11/22/2008 15:49 PM

» Automotive wire/stun gun
by psycix on 11/22/2008 13:07 PM

» Canadian Pipe
by psycix on 11/22/2008 13:04 PM

» Pumpkin Chunkin on Scienc
by psycix on 11/22/2008 13:00 PM

» Most Efficient Projectile
by Ragnarok on 11/22/2008 12:50 PM


Donate

Hi Guest!
As you're not registered, some features could be unavailable. Click here if you want to become a member of SpudFiles
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    

Post new topic  Reply to topic
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 Proposed Carburated Bolt Action Cannon (Need Feedback) « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
What is the probability of this design working?
High
40%
 40%  [ 4 ]
Low
30%
 30%  [ 3 ]
It Seems Hard To Tell
30%
 30%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 10
Author Message
rcman50166
PostPosted: 05/01/2008 9:45 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major
Major

Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 381
1022.10 Spud Bux

Gasoline engines use the compression stroke to release more energy on the power stroke. It isn't absolutely necessary for combustion. On diesel engines however, it is required.

@ Cosmic Muffin True, gasoline itself doesn't combust but it has a very high evaporation rate. The vapors mixed with air causes the combustion. This is the reason why so little fuel is needed per stroke. If the amount being injected is equal to the amount being vaporized and combusted then there is no reason to fear flooding. However too much or too little per stroke can result in flooding as too little would not ignite and collect beyond the ignition ratio while too much saturates the air to a point where there isn't enough oxygen to reach igniton.
Back to top
Binder17
PostPosted: 05/19/2008 8:44 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Corporal
Corporal

Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 75
180.21 Spud Bux

I like the concept and I think it may be possible to use with other fuels, with a few modifications. I experimented with gasoline as a fuel once and I haven't found it very effective. It is not very powerful and is not clean burning. It doesn't seem like this design would work well without some kind of fuel compression.
Back to top
rcman50166
PostPosted: 05/19/2008 10:39 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major
Major

Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 381
1022.10 Spud Bux

Maybe you've had a bad experience with gasoline, but I have found, after some testing, that gas is actually a very good fuel. There may be carbon buildup after a while but for a seal that is a good thing. You could also try something of a higher octane or alcohol based. Those typically burn cleaner at lower pressures.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3

Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


SpudFiles Version 7.0
Template based off DAJ Glass Template by Dustin Baccetti
Photo Album Addon © 2002-2003 by Smartor
Powered by modified phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group