Logo
HomeForumCannonsWikiAlbumArchive
SpudFiles
Users  Rules   Search  Search   Chat  Chat   FAQ  FAQ   Memberlist  Memberlist   How-To  How-To   Other  Other
Register  ::  Log in Private Messages


Random Cannon

Recent topics
» All metal shotgun
by CpTn_lAw on 11/22/2008 17:10 PM

» Frankrede's Mauler Cannon
by frankrede on 11/22/2008 17:08 PM

» my first coaxial
by chrissexton on 11/22/2008 17:04 PM

» Who wants cannons in CAD?
by frankrede on 11/22/2008 16:52 PM

» BB Coaxial
by SEAKING9006 on 11/22/2008 16:44 PM

» Pneumatic Smoothbore Shot
by frankrede on 11/22/2008 16:42 PM

» 2 questions
by theepicmool on 11/22/2008 16:24 PM


Donate

Hi Guest!
As you're not registered, some features could be unavailable. Click here if you want to become a member of SpudFiles
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Ramrod/Pump « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Hawkeye
PostPosted: 11/28/2007 16:37 PM    Post subject: Ramrod/Pump Reply with quote

Major
Major

Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 358
997.37 Spud Bux

With some discussions often leaning towards attaining higher pressures more readily it occurred to me that it might be easy to quickly pump up a gun with a small chamber to the max of a track pump and then fill it to high pressure by using the barrel as a secondary pump cylinder.
The piston would make a good one way fill valve once it was set in position.
A half inch copper barrel would make an optimum diameter pump cylinder for getting up to 400 psi or so.
A simple ram rod with a piston head like a shock pump would work nicely. A reducer could be sleeved on the ramrod and slipped over the barrel end to align the piston while pumping. The gun would function as the handle of the pump and the barrel would be pointed towards the ground.
Thoughts?
Back to top
mopherman
PostPosted: 11/28/2007 16:47 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brigadier General
Brigadier General

Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 796
847.70 Spud Bux

I thought about this a while ago. My only worry was accidentaly shooting myself in the face Shocked . Couldnt you push open the piston with the stick and hurt yourself?
Back to top
experament-u2
PostPosted: 11/28/2007 16:58 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 478
603.61 Spud Bux

mopherman wrote:
I thought about this a while ago. My only worry was accidentaly shooting myself in the face Shocked . Couldnt you push open the piston with the stick and hurt yourself?


first thing that jumped into my mind was the pump handle jumping into my skull

i dont know if it would be that safe but i think its a good idea that way you can have a portable pump built into your gun. and instead of a reducer fir the end invest in a threaded fitting so it can be screwed onto the end of the barrel might feel a bit safer.
Back to top
Infernal Maveric
PostPosted: 11/28/2007 17:03 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant

Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 220
684.90 Spud Bux

It would work as long as the air you are pumping into the barrel end of the gun goes through the piston valve seal, otherwise the ramrod will leave a nice bruise/gash in our face.

I'm not saying never try it, just that if you do, try it with a full-face helmet on perhaps.
Back to top
Hawkeye
PostPosted: 11/28/2007 17:07 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major
Major

Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 358
997.37 Spud Bux

The ramrod is placed against the ground, not towards your face.
I really doubt you could upset the piston enough to fire the gun. The pilot volume would be resisting too strongly and the piston would be in a tube that controls it from wandering around. A low volume high pressure pump just squeaks air past a one way valve. You would have a great deal of trouble suddenly forcing in more air than it is resisting with.
You could greatly minimize the chamber volume needed with the increased pressure potential.
I will add that when air doesn't go past a valve, a pump just acts like a set of shocks. The return is not violent. It will just bounce back at the same rate you forced down on it.
Back to top
fred
PostPosted: 11/29/2007 3:08 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Corporal
Corporal

Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 65
153.59 Spud Bux

I would like to ad a note to the above discussion. I have constructed 7 cannons so far from simple to high tech stainless. The first one was pneumatic. It was first charged with air than the spud was pushed down the barrel. It,s amazing how much pressure this puts on the barrel seal. Halfway down the barrel it slightly broke the barrel air seal and the spud and ramrod went flying through the wall. So it is dangerous.
To get around this I drilled an 1/8" hole near the chamber end and put a slip coupling over it. After charging the chamber I rotate the coupling to expose the air hole. This relieves the pressure when forcing the spud down the barrel. When the spud is all the way down turn the coupling to seal the barrel. The slight leak between the seal and barrel has little effect on the pressure from firing. Hope this helps.
I cad draw a diagram if this is to confusing.
Back to top
psycix
PostPosted: 11/29/2007 6:48 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major General
Major General

Joined: 25 Jun 2007
Posts: 1830
291.34 Spud Bux

Just make a spud stopper (a piston stopper in this case) at the breech end of the barrel.
This way you cant hammer the piston accedentically.

Oh btw, even with the ramrod placed against the ground, this will send your cannon flying Wink
Back to top
Hawkeye
PostPosted: 11/29/2007 7:58 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major
Major

Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 358
997.37 Spud Bux

I am talking of very small volumes and diameter of barrel. That greatly changes how much air you are capable of forcing past the piston.
I am not talking of large caliber potato guns with giant pistons.
Of course the gun would be forced up rather than the ramrod if it is reversed and the piston is unseated.
This is really no different than making a pump that works reliably. As long as you can't dislocate the piston/check valve, it shouldn't fire by accident.
Back to top
fred
PostPosted: 11/29/2007 12:10 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Corporal
Corporal

Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 65
153.59 Spud Bux

Answer to psycix. The stopper will in fact stop the spud at the breech. However it is the air pressure ahead of the spud as you push it down the barrel that can push the piston open. At sixty pounds of air in the chamber it can happen. Believe me I know. Mine went off at 90 lbs. Even if you crack the barrel seal sightly it will release all the air in the chamber. Anyway, that is my experience, I am just sharing it.
Back to top
Hawkeye
PostPosted: 11/29/2007 13:14 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major
Major

Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 358
997.37 Spud Bux

How were you measuring pressure in the barrel? I still don't follow how cracking the seal slightly will release all the air. If you don't crack the seal on each pump stroke, you would never be able to fill a chamber with a one way valve of any type and a pump that screws onto a fitting housing a valve.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic

Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


SpudFiles Version 7.0
Template based off DAJ Glass Template by Dustin Baccetti
Photo Album Addon © 2002-2003 by Smartor
Powered by modified phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group