| Author |
Message
|
| jrrdw |
 Posted: 02/01/2008 5:38 AM Post subject: |
 |
|
Donating Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3278
5111.40 Spud Bux
|
| Hotwired wrote: | Holy macaroni!
Hotwired and jigabo0  |
The slang is "Holy Mackerel" not "Holy Macaroni" But being that theses 5 vowels in English language, the occurrence of a randomly repeated letter is common. What are the odds of using the number zero as the last digit in the two names? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Hotwired |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 6:26 AM Post subject: |
|
|
UK Spudgunner
Joined: 13 Oct 2006
Posts: 1800
3889.01 Spud Bux
|
No, I really did mean to say that 
Besides it's not.
jigabo0 is last, dippydodo03 is second last and has the number 3 in addition. It's not really a very strong connection was my point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jrrdw |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 8:01 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Donating Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3278
5111.40 Spud Bux
|
If the schools district IP is locked out, does that include households in that district? That means 'district' in a broad sence, not just limited to the school??? I'm asking because I'm wondering how many other members mite be in that district??? They to would now be locked out.
 
The gate gaurd, lol! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| paaiyan |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 9:00 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Ascendant Defenestrator
Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 2056
2624.44 Spud Bux
|
| jrrdw wrote: | If the schools district IP is locked out, does that include households in that district? That means 'district' in a broad sence, not just limited to the school??? I'm asking because I'm wondering how many other members mite be in that district??? They to would now be locked out.
The gate gaurd, lol! |
No, just people on the school's internal network. So unless someone is either tapping into the school's wireless, or clandestinely ran a hardline, it won't affect homes.
EDIT: Or maybe you meant other schools... It depends, if those other schools all share one internet connection, such as a T-1, then yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| dippydodo03 |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 9:41 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Staff Sergeant
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 103
130.96 Spud Bux
|
jrrdw, love the conspiicy therory but your wrong. why would i do that if i have been here tryin to clear schmans mane.
all your evidence relies on what you think is the truth. here in america courts, we find people innocent untill proven guilty. and you cant just rely on probable cause which MC has done. you have no reason to bann him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| paaiyan |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 9:47 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Ascendant Defenestrator
Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 2056
2624.44 Spud Bux
|
Newsflash, this isn't an American court, this is a website owned and operated by a private entity who makes all the rules. Our evidence as far as I know is that schmanman posted several times from the same IP address as this person. Maybe there's more to the story that they aren't telling everyone, maybe there was tension between scman and the mods/PCGUY before. That's plenty of evidence for PCGUY to ban that IP range and everyone who used it temporarily.
Let's get one thing straight here, your opinion on this matter is worth about as much as a sack of crap. Our evidence is circumstantial, yes, but yours isn't even that. Yours is simply testimony on your part. PCGUY and the mods are dealing with this. What happens happens, and no amount of whining on your part is going to change that. Get over it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jrrdw |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 10:12 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Donating Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3278
5111.40 Spud Bux
|
| dippydodo03 wrote: | jrrdw, love the conspiicy therory but your wrong. why would i do that if i have been here tryin to clear schmans mane.
all your evidence relies on what you think is the truth. here in america courts, we find people innocent untill proven guilty. and you cant just rely on probable cause which MC has done. you have no reason to bann him. |
Hahahahaaa....You have obviously never been to court in the real world!!! It's harder then hell to prove your innocents when the officers fact sheet says different as the prosecutor reads it out loud to his honorable judge whats his name.
In the real world it's prove yourself innocent if your able, and if you don't believe that don't ever get yourself in any legal trouble.
As for conspiracy theory, I don't believe in them. I merely pointed out similarity's that others over looked or just didn't mention.
I'm kinda into investigative work, thats why I want to know who is behind this. Yes, I do have my suspicions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| paaiyan |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 10:16 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Ascendant Defenestrator
Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 2056
2624.44 Spud Bux
|
| Jr, you're right, it's often harder to prove your innocence than one would think, but I still stand by the fact that this website bears no semblance to an American court. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jrrdw |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 10:21 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Donating Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3278
5111.40 Spud Bux
|
| paaiyan wrote: | | Jr, you're right, it's often harder to prove your innocence than one would think, but I still stand by the fact that this website bears no semblance to an American court. |
Very well said!   His honorable PCGUY precideing! Lol.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| dippydodo03 |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 12:25 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Staff Sergeant
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 103
130.96 Spud Bux
|
| you people are thick in the head. just bann me so i wont be tortured. even after you are proved wrong you still come back with a comment saying that i have no idea what i'm talking about when i'm the one that knows wtf is goin on. now watch, someone will post something trying to tare me down. i believe when i made this topic, i said please dont respond if you arnt a moderator. why dont we all just let this go and act like adults here instead of arguing about the american justice system and wether or not pc is a sellout. god damn people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| paaiyan |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 12:27 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Ascendant Defenestrator
Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 2056
2624.44 Spud Bux
|
Number one, you have no right to say who can and can't respond.
Number two, how were we proved wrong? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| potatoflinger |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 12:36 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Seasoned Spudder
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 999
368.61 Spud Bux
|
| ^ And number three, if you don't like it, don't come back! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PCGUY |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 13:15 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Evil Admin
Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 1233
4406.12 Spud Bux
|
Trust me I would not do this soly on IP address, since I know plenty of people are behind that IP address.
All of my facts before combined with the fact that schmanman (or at least his account) replied to lots of jig's posts just seconds after they were posted, repeatedly. Far too many to be just a coincidence, if someone posts then schmanman posts from the same IP seconds later, and it happens at least half a dozen times, then chances are they were sitting next to each other when it happened.
Regardless, schmanman has been unbanned. If anything else happens however... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| schmanman |
| Posted: 02/01/2008 13:21 PM Post subject: |
|
|
blabbering idiot
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 1667
1006.17 Spud Bux
|
nothing will happen. ever
please just trust me people, I love the site, and would not do anything like that, ever.
I'll leave it at that, and I think everyone would like it if we could just forget this whole fiasco.
nuff' said.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
