| Author |
Message
|
| Lockednloaded |
 Posted: 07/12/2010 16:16 PM Post subject: Some quick questions |
 |
|
El Moderador
Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 1345
376.81 Spud Bux
|
I'm building a QEV semi, but i like customizability, so i decided to make it able to fire full automatically and as a powerful hybrid. To do this I'm just removing the 3-way valve and putting on a a pop-off and and a quick connect fitting. with an externally metered propane mix I hope to go up to 4x.
My question is, what kind of pressure will this create? And will a 3/4" QEV be able to handle it? lastly, what pressure pop off do I need? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| POLAND_SPUD |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 16:26 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Lieutenant General
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 4386
11899.05 Spud Bux
|
you don't need the pop-off and QEV... all you need is a plain piston valved hybrid... there have been at least a couple of such guns
| Quote: | | what kind of pressure will this create | use HGDT
Also if you want to build a semi hybrid then you need to find a way to vent the chamebr after each shot... well not to mention that it neds a loading mech too
have a look here -> http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/spring-piston-exhausted-hybrid-chamber -t20439.html
you might find some of it useful |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Lockednloaded |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 16:29 PM Post subject: |
|
|
El Moderador
Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 1345
376.81 Spud Bux
|
sorry, I was unclear. A NORMAL piston hybrid, single shot
can't download HGDT, I have a mac  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| POLAND_SPUD |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 18:04 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Lieutenant General
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 4386
11899.05 Spud Bux
|
IIRC someone posted a similar thread yesterday...
rag said that 1X mix is able to generate about 100 psi... so 4X = 400psi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Lockednloaded |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 19:28 PM Post subject: |
|
|
El Moderador
Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 1345
376.81 Spud Bux
|
| so the QEV piloted by a 250psi pop-off will work @ 4X? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ragnarok |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 19:42 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Lord of Karma
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 5158
16113.53 Spud Bux
|
Probably. But 100 psi per X is only a rough rule, and is more to be considered the probable maximum than necessarily a value that will be reached.
As far as theoretical maximum, it's about 120 psi at 1X... I think. I'd check it in GasEQ, but for some (presumably stupid) reason, I can't get it to work today.
Okay, maybe I can. 121.8 psi, apparently, for a 1X mix. 541.9 psi for a 4X mix. (It may not seem perfectly linear, but the absolute pressures are reasonably thus.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Lockednloaded |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 19:46 PM Post subject: |
|
|
El Moderador
Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 1345
376.81 Spud Bux
|
| so 1" galvanized chamber with a 3/4" QEV will be safe? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ragnarok |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 19:46 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Lord of Karma
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 5158
16113.53 Spud Bux
|
Define "safe".  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Lockednloaded |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 19:48 PM Post subject: |
|
|
El Moderador
Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 1345
376.81 Spud Bux
|
safe for anything not down range 
edit: so i'd probably triple the performance of my current 200 psi launcher right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ragnarok |
| Posted: 07/12/2010 21:06 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Lord of Karma
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 5158
16113.53 Spud Bux
|
| Lockednloaded wrote: | | safe for anything not down range |
Again, define safe. There are different degrees of safe - unlikely to cause injury, unlikely to suffer failure, weapons testing range level of safety...
I guess it's probably safe by the normally perceived standard of safe the forum seems to hold, but ultimately, most launchers are somewhat kludged contraptions that use parts that were never intended for the purpose.
| Quote: | | so i'd probably triple the performance of my current 200 psi launcher right? |
Probably not. Double... maybe. Triple... well, that depends on how many flow and transonic losses your other launcher is getting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Lockednloaded |
| Posted: 07/13/2010 6:14 AM Post subject: |
|
|
El Moderador
Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 1345
376.81 Spud Bux
|
I want the launcher to be safe to fire from my hands over and over again without any flukes. I want the peak pressure to stay at or below the pressure rating on my chamber.
has anyone ever built a piston hybrid with a QEV piloted by a pop-off |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Technician1002 |
| Posted: 07/13/2010 8:22 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Senior Technician
Joined: 04 Apr 2009
Posts: 4669
15519.19 Spud Bux
|
A pop off is a limited volume device. It has a rated flow rate when open to release energy in a safe mannor.
Due to the pilot area volume and finite time to vent it, the delay in the design may be too slow to protect you from peak pressures.
A regular piston hybrid would be much faster opening. The proper selection of the piston ratio could set the desired pressure rise at opening.
The pop-off could be still used in the pilot area to act as a dashpot relief valve to remove some of the energy stored in the pressure in the pilot when the piston does open. This would reduce the force the piston would have to reclose when the chamber pressure no longer holds it open. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Lockednloaded |
| Posted: 07/13/2010 9:32 AM Post subject: |
|
|
El Moderador
Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 1345
376.81 Spud Bux
|
| with a lower pressure pop-off, I don't see why it wouldn't open and stay open at the ignition point. I may lose power by having the pop-off pop before the pressure can build, but safety first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Technician1002 |
| Posted: 07/13/2010 10:46 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Senior Technician
Joined: 04 Apr 2009
Posts: 4669
15519.19 Spud Bux
|
If you depend on the pop off to pilot the valve, there is an obstruction between the chamber and it's pressure rise and the pilot area with the pop off valve. If the sudden rise in chamber pressure does not lift the QEV, the pilot area will have to wait for the chamber pressure to bleed into the pilot area before the pop off valve opens to pilot the main valve. By the time the pilot area has risen enough in pressure, the main chamber may be over pressure.
Remember the pop off on a QEV is not responding directly to the chamber in real time. There is a delay for the pilot to rise too.
Most likely what will happen is the chamber pressure rise will create enough of a pressure differential on the QEV and it will pilot itself, then the pilot area will rise in pressure and the pop off will open. By the time this happens, the projectile is well on it's way down range. The difficulty is the pop off is not governing the pressure the QEV will open so the pressure and safety is unknown. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ramses |
| Posted: 07/13/2010 10:53 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Major General
Joined: 29 May 2008
Posts: 1519
3981.54 Spud Bux
|
| The solution would be using the exhaust of a pop-off connected to the chamber to open a pilot valve on the QEV. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
