Logo
HomeForumCannonsWikiAlbumArchive
SpudFiles
Users  Rules   Search  Search   Chat  Chat   FAQ  FAQ   Memberlist  Memberlist   How-To  How-To   Other  Other
Register  ::  Log in Private Messages


Random Cannon

Recent topics
» Pumpkin Chunkin on Scienc
by FishBoy on 11/21/2008 20:27 PM

» First cannon
by PythonWallace on 11/21/2008 20:12 PM

» African widlife cam
by starman on 11/21/2008 19:17 PM

» Chatroom Requests
by Ragnarok on 11/21/2008 18:57 PM

» Cellular core ABS
by Moonbogg on 11/21/2008 18:29 PM

» Canadian Pipe
by MrCrowley on 11/21/2008 16:31 PM

» Where did the 100 psi ass
by MrCrowley on 11/21/2008 16:20 PM


Donate

Hi Guest!
As you're not registered, some features could be unavailable. Click here if you want to become a member of SpudFiles
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    

Post new topic  Reply to topic
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 Vortex Inlet changes « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Davidvaini
PostPosted: 04/01/2008 23:25 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Airsoft and BBMG Expert
Colonel

Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 708
460.91 Spud Bux

lol okay im putting a stop to all the confusificiationism...

now that we know what he wants... why do you want the air inlet to be there... you can still have your tank under your barrel... its called hose... it can wrap around...
Back to top
jackssmirkingrevenge
PostPosted: 04/01/2008 23:51 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

space monkey
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 6981
11122.02 Spud Bux

Going with the views expressed here, playing with the inlet position isn't really going to affect performance significantly. What you should be concerned with is the rate of flow into your BB chamber.
Back to top
Lentamentalisk
PostPosted: 04/02/2008 1:29 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Resident Tinkerer
Brigadier General

Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 801
818.16 Spud Bux

If I had a tank of high pressure air with no regulator attached, but didnt want to kill what ever I shot at, would it be sufficient to run it through a tiny valve with bad flow? or would that kill my performance in ways other than lowering the muzzle velocity?
Back to top
jackssmirkingrevenge
PostPosted: 04/02/2008 1:37 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

space monkey
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 6981
11122.02 Spud Bux

Quote:
Would it be sufficient to run it through a tiny valve with bad flow?


That would work, coupled with a BB chamber large enough to act as a de facto expansion chamber.
Back to top
Lentamentalisk
PostPosted: 04/02/2008 1:46 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Resident Tinkerer
Brigadier General

Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 801
818.16 Spud Bux

here is my rough sketch of what I want to do:

The entire top part of the T that houses the Vortex cap will be filled with epoxy to get rid of places for BBs to get stuck. The restricting valve would go somewhere near the pressure washer side of the blue air hose, and could serve as an additional safety to the one already built into the pressure washer.
Yes I realize the whole chamber bending around thing is bulky, but in real life I will cut that down a little more.
The entire thing will be filled from a high pressure pump that I'm gona make
What do you think?
Back to top
jackssmirkingrevenge
PostPosted: 04/02/2008 1:50 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

space monkey
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 6981
11122.02 Spud Bux

Looks good, restricting the diameter of the blue pipe should be enough to limit performance.
Back to top
Lentamentalisk
PostPosted: 04/02/2008 1:56 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Resident Tinkerer
Brigadier General

Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 801
818.16 Spud Bux

I just thought that if I use a valve of some sort, then I can adjust it as I see fit. I dont want to go through the whole process and find out it only spits BBs at 10fps or it shoots them out at 1000fps...
Back to top
jackssmirkingrevenge
PostPosted: 04/02/2008 6:08 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

space monkey
<b>Donating Member</b>

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 6981
11122.02 Spud Bux

Of course building in some sort of adjustable valve between the trigger and the BB chamber is a sensible provision to make, a small ball valve would be a good idea.
Back to top
Lentamentalisk
PostPosted: 04/02/2008 22:35 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Resident Tinkerer
Brigadier General

Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 801
818.16 Spud Bux

I was thinking a needle valve because they are highly adjustable, if I'm not mistaken, needing several rotations to open completely as opposed to a ball's 1/4 of a rotation.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2

Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


SpudFiles Version 7.0
Template based off DAJ Glass Template by Dustin Baccetti
Photo Album Addon © 2002-2003 by Smartor
Powered by modified phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group