| Author |
Message
|
| BC Pneumatics |
 Posted: 03/05/2007 8:42 AM Post subject: |
 |
|
Mr Mod Man
Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 981
1996.24 Spud Bux
|
| joannaardway wrote: | | I don't know - it's possible to kill instantly without breaking the skin, just through sheer blunt impact trauma. |
With a high power cannon and a lucky shot. (And with the accuracy of most of these things, it would be luck) The point isn't 'is it possible,' the point is 'is it practical'.
| Quote: |
It's not penetration that kills, it's how densely energy is distributed to the target. |
If your round penetrates through the skin, muscle, and meat, into the heart (Which is in fact the target), then it will distribute it's energy there a lot better than it could from outside the animal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| joannaardway |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 9:04 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Brigadier General
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 961
115.90 Spud Bux
|
There are numerous cases of people dying after being shot, despite the fact that none of the projectiles pierced their skin (things like birdshot from a shotgun can do this - it's rare, but it happens)
Hitting the heart or head is not essential to killing. Modern ammunition (the type usually issued to special forces) can easily kill (more or less instantly) in one shot with less than 3 inches of penetration, even if it hits nowhere near either.
Ok, hitting the heart may be a little more effective, but blood-loss and internal bleeding are unlikely to be the cause of death if hit by a spudgun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| BC Pneumatics |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 9:20 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Mr Mod Man
Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 981
1996.24 Spud Bux
|
Numerous cases, yet billions of people. (Okay, this isn't fair)
What I am saying is, I wouldn't rely on it for hunting. It is a long shot at best. (Not sure if that is a pun...)
You're completely correct, it isn't essential, but it is pretty damn effective, especially if you are using an underpowered devise. (Not that a spudgun would be underpowered- they put off more power than a .22 to be sure.)
I wouldn't say 'unlikely', it seems to me to be a perfectly possible scenario considering the accuracy of the weapon. Hopefully (aside from a near instant kill of course) you would be able to break a leg, or a rib to collapse a lung, so the animal wouldn't be going anywhere and you could approach and kill it. But what if you hit it in some place that doesn't bring it down? When dealing with lives and weapons, it is always important to consider the worst case scenario, then weight that situation against it's probability. If you ask me, what I have described is far too likely to happen for us to consider large cannons 'reasonable' hunting apparatuses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Hotwired |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 10:37 AM Post subject: |
|
|
UK Spudgunner
Joined: 13 Oct 2006
Posts: 1434
42.48 Spud Bux
|
Why are you talking about this stuff here....
Cannons are as lethal as the projectile. One could be used to launch a finned and saboted tungsten dart through a brick wall or merely leave a damp patch with a potato.
I personally wouldn't be bothered if people posted hunting kills but I can easily see it being considered to upset others. Even if said others don't actually visit these forums...
Personally I'd like to see spoiler tags 
You can find them on some other forums to hide or reveal sections of a post to hide or show relevant information without having all of it lumped there in one go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| WOW!! |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 11:11 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Brigadier General
Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 883
462.84 Spud Bux
|
| Hotwired wrote: | Why are you talking about this stuff here....
Cannons are as lethal as the projectile. One could be used to launch a finned and saboted tungsten dart through a brick wall or merely leave a damp patch with a potato.
I personally wouldn't be bothered if people posted hunting kills but I can easily see it being considered to upset others. Even if said others don't actually visit these forums...
Personally I'd like to see spoiler tags
You can find them on some other forums to hide or reveal sections of a post to hide or show relevant information without having all of it lumped there in one go. |
The only thing is if you hit and don't kill it, then you can be charged with animal cruitle. I don't mind hunting, but make sure it is powerful enough to kill it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| chaos |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 15:40 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Brigadier General
Joined: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 1221
908.08 Spud Bux
|
Even some small firearms, compound bows do not kill instantly especially with bow hunting, but i don't see as long as you place your shot right at the force of a marble will stun if not kill a rabbit and or other small game/pests with one hit. one thing that confuses me about this thread is that there are other sites w/homemade air guns that are specifically designed to kill deer and larger game although most of them are CO2 the same results can be achieved from high pressure air.
Peace |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| pyromaniac |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 16:49 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Brigadier General
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 813
890.79 Spud Bux
|
i'd only kill squirrels and birds. funny story there were two blackbirds on my neighbors house. My dad saw em and called my sister and i downstairs. He took out my pellet gun and killed them. My neighbor saw and was seriously ticked off.
has anyone had squirrel stew? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| frankrede |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 18:43 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Sangheili
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 2521
204.86 Spud Bux
|
I would love to take on a bear, I think with a the proper ammo my gun could do it if I was within 25 yards.
But that would be mean |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| BC Pneumatics |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 20:25 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Mr Mod Man
Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 981
1996.24 Spud Bux
|
| frankrede wrote: | I would love to take on a bear, I think with a the proper ammo my gun could do it if I was within 25 yards.
But that would be mean |
Nut sure I would count on this. If you try, you will surely be killed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| frankrede |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 21:19 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Sangheili
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 2521
204.86 Spud Bux
|
| A piston gun with my penetrating ammo aimed towards the chest would definetly either kill the bear semi-instantly or hurt it enough so it goes way to die. But then again I would hope I am never in teh situation where my only choice is a spudgun |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| WOW!! |
| Posted: 03/05/2007 21:34 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Brigadier General
Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 883
462.84 Spud Bux
|
| frankrede wrote: | | But then again I would hope I am never in teh situation where my only choice is a spudgun |
^^^ What he said. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| chaos |
| Posted: 03/06/2007 0:11 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Brigadier General
Joined: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 1221
908.08 Spud Bux
|
if you used arrow bolts with decent broad heads it would surly kill a bear at a decent amount of pressure probably more humane than with a bow(more fps)
peace |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Hotwired |
| Posted: 03/06/2007 4:06 AM Post subject: |
|
|
UK Spudgunner
Joined: 13 Oct 2006
Posts: 1434
42.48 Spud Bux
|
| frankrede wrote: | I would love to take on a bear, I think with a the proper ammo my gun could do it if I was within 25 yards.
But that would be mean |
A bear cub maybe. A sleeping bear cub. A sleeping bear cub whose mummy takes your head off with a paw for being mean to it.
I'd say stay the fork away from any bear. Unlike small critters or deer they will get pissed at you hitting them with your improvised ammo, they won't die and they will then turn you into dog food. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| joannaardway |
| Posted: 03/06/2007 6:06 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Brigadier General
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 961
115.90 Spud Bux
|
Stay away from bears unless you happen to be wearing a suit of power armour, and have some sort of full-automatic shotgun.
Or have no other choice.
A spudgun wouldn't have any guarantees, but if you used a heavy metal dart and hit one of the following:
1) The brain, and did enough damage to stop it.
2) The neck, or more specifically the spine, and you severed it.
3) The heart, and you left a gaping hole through it.
4) Hitting a critical blood vessel, like the jugular or aorta, (Or whatever the bear's equivalent is) might stop it fast enough, but it's a risk.
It might just work.
Anything else, and it'd likely keep going (they are exceptionally tough) so you'd have to reload, which wouldn't be good.
If you hit a lung, it could keep going more than long enough to kill you. Blood loss wouldn't stop it quickly enough (exceptions above). Hit a limb, and it wouldn't stop it. Hit the stomach, kidneys, liver, or any of this stuff, and it'll die eventually, but again, not fast enough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| BC Pneumatics |
| Posted: 03/06/2007 7:45 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Mr Mod Man
Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 981
1996.24 Spud Bux
|
25yrds is what gets me. A full grown grizzly can accelerate faster than thoroughbred racehorse. I have talked with people who live around 'bear country', and they don't trust a full cylinder of FMJ .45's to even come close to stopping a bear.
Bear hunting is serious crap.
Last edited by BC Pneumatics on 03/06/2007 8:00 AM; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
