Logo
HomeForumCannonsWikiAlbumArchive
SpudFiles
Users  Rules   Search  Search   Chat  Chat   FAQ  FAQ   Memberlist  Memberlist   How-To  How-To   Other  Other
Register  ::  Log in Private Messages


Random Cannon

Recent topics
» Airsoft bb's not indicati
by Gippeto on 12/01/2008 9:30 AM

» Alternative ammo for GB c
by FishBoy on 12/01/2008 9:20 AM

» Completed Sniper Rifle
by that_guy on 12/01/2008 9:16 AM

» SG 110 "murderlizor&
by Radiation on 12/01/2008 8:57 AM

» XL water gun
by john bunsenburner on 12/01/2008 8:03 AM

» Brazing kills sharders
by john bunsenburner on 12/01/2008 7:11 AM

» post disappeared
by doochman on 12/01/2008 6:21 AM


Donate

Hi Guest!
As you're not registered, some features could be unavailable. Click here if you want to become a member of SpudFiles
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 which is better? « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
tntlly
PostPosted: 10/15/2006 22:01 PM    Post subject: which is better? Reply with quote

Corporal
Corporal

Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 72
125.57 Spud Bux

for my next cannon i wanna make a piston because i haven't done that yet. is there much of a difference between co-axial and over-under?
Back to top
MrCrowley
PostPosted: 10/15/2006 22:41 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Blizzard of Ozz
<b>Moderator</b>

Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 6178
3296.83 Spud Bux

well that is the difference,one has a chamber under the barrel the other the barrel is in the chmaber,a over-under would get more power then a co-ax of the same size as the barrel takes up the chmabers volume so you just make the chamber longer.
Back to top
tntlly
PostPosted: 10/15/2006 22:59 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Corporal
Corporal

Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 72
125.57 Spud Bux

so, power wise, it just depends on your dimensions, there's no real stand-out performance difference between a typical co-axial and an over/under?
Back to top
Infernal Maveric
PostPosted: 10/16/2006 3:41 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant

Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 220
684.90 Spud Bux

Well I would think that a Co-axle would preform better that a piston valve if the dimensions were correct, but then again the supah is a over-under style pistion (chamber sealing) valve.

It realy depends on the size of your chamber, size of your barrel, weight of the piston, air tightness of pistion, PSi your using.

Just make what ever feels best for you because it is ultimatly about the specifitaction of the gun you wanna make
Back to top
jrrdw
PostPosted: 10/16/2006 4:25 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Donating Moderator
<b>Donating Moderator</b>

Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3284
5123.35 Spud Bux

From what i read in here i would have to agree with Infernal Maveric, the co-axle delivers a straight push of air, with the over and under the air has to push around corners, slowing down the reaction time, i beleave only by milla seconds, ask Boilingleadbath, he's the math wiz!
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic

Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


SpudFiles Version 7.0
Template based off DAJ Glass Template by Dustin Baccetti
Photo Album Addon © 2002-2003 by Smartor
Powered by modified phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group