Login    Register
User Information
Username:
Password:
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Sponsored
Who is online

In total there are 60 users online :: 5 registered, 0 hidden and 55 guests


Most users ever online was 218 on Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:58 pm

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Administrators
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

How to make an electrolysis machine

Come find a how-to on how to do something, or come write your own for other people.
Sponsored 
  • Author
    Message

Unread postAuthor: RJB INDUSTRIES » Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:57 am

Look i am european...

I mean glued the PVC and after put bolts around....


RJB INDUSTRIES
  • 0

User avatar
RJB INDUSTRIES
Sergeant First Class
Sergeant First Class
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:49 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Labtecpower » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:04 am

That isn't neccessary, when properly glued it can hold a lot of pressure. Putting bolts in will only weaken the PVC.
  • 0

"ñøw mÿ šįg šüçkś!"
User avatar
Labtecpower
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:38 am
Location: Herb Island
Reputation: 7

Unread postAuthor: RJB INDUSTRIES » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:28 am

ok thanks man...
  • 0

User avatar
RJB INDUSTRIES
Sergeant First Class
Sergeant First Class
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:49 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Zeus » Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:47 pm

RJB, believe me, DYI is to be feared. I've been in discussion with him on alternate propellant systems, and what's in the reach of most is quite suprising.

MrC, the concept DYI and I have been discussing, you'd better be afraid. He's working through me. :lol:
  • 0

/sarcasm, /hyperbole
User avatar
Zeus
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: 'Straya, C*nt
Reputation: 2

Unread postAuthor: SpudBlaster15 » Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:16 pm

RJB INDUSTRIES wrote:please show me your best cannon...


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'm sorry, but having closely followed nearly every cannon DYI has built over the years, I just find it comical that someone with zero demonstrated experience in this field is unknowingly issuing a challenge to one of the most experienced and knowledgeable members of this site.

RJB INDUSTRIES wrote:When the (for an example) gasoline goes inside the chamber like a gas because my system allow this...at the same time, the ignition circuit turns on....because i invent one thing that i called DAV "double-acting valve" and the same action i mean when i press the valve to the fuel goes inside the chamber, the ignition circuit turn on and we have the best exlosion we can get...


Set your system up to measure, inject, vapourize, and effectively diffuse a stoichiometric quantity of liquid nitromethane, and I may be slightly impressed.
  • 0

People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
User avatar
SpudBlaster15
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 2385
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
Location: Canada
Country: Poland (pl)
Reputation: 3

Unread postAuthor: ramses » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:45 pm

I think it's pretty obvious at this point that RJB INDUSTRIES is trolling, but I'll reply anyway.

DYI's aluminum/h2o gun uses enough electricity to kill you 750 times over in each shot. It creates peak pressures well in excess of the tensile strength of the chamber material. (not the burst pressure, but the yield strength of the material) It is held together by inertia. He designed a PLASTIC insulator that can contain this pressure without extruding itself. Earlier designs extruded the plastic thorough a metal hole.

If you can shoot a .12g airsoft BB through a steel coin, your arrogance may be forgiven by this forum.
  • 0

POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name :D
User avatar
ramses
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:50 pm
Reputation: 3

Unread postAuthor: Technician1002 » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:28 pm

Set your system up to measure, inject, vapourize, and effectively diffuse a stoichiometric quantity of liquid nitromethane, and I may be slightly impressed.


Simply filling the chamber will do the job fine. No additional oxizider is needed. Power will be impressive too. :D
  • 0

User avatar
Technician1002
Chief of Staff
Chief of Staff
 
Posts: 5190
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
Reputation: 14

Sponsored

Sponsor
 


Unread postAuthor: RJB INDUSTRIES » Tue Sep 13, 2011 12:54 pm

my arrogance?? What a f...??? Are you sleeping?? Read how they talk to me... Ok ? I see you like a baby with your papa "DYI"... Be a man, talk nice....
  • 0

User avatar
RJB INDUSTRIES
Sergeant First Class
Sergeant First Class
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:49 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: wyz2285 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:05 pm

RJB case you DIDN´T see this, take a look
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtopic,p,330314.html#330314
  • 0

CpTn_lAw wrote::D "yay, me wanna make big multishot pnoob with 1000 psi foot pump compressor using diamond as main material. Do you think wet bread make good sealant? " :D
User avatar
wyz2285
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:50 am
Location: Porto, Portugal
Country: Portugal (pt)
Reputation: 12

Unread postAuthor: velocity3x » Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:27 pm

RJB came here to talk about a design which he thought was good and it was certainly no worse than some of the crap that's proposed here from time to time. The conversation deteriorated to subtle jabs immediately after his first post. He didn't know DIY or his qualifications....so what! Quit acting like a pack of Rabid Hyenas and give him a chance to fit in.
  • 0

User avatar
velocity3x
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Yuma, Arizona
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 7

Unread postAuthor: ramses » Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:14 pm

velocity3x wrote:RJB came here to talk about a design which he thought was good and it was certainly no worse than some of the crap that's proposed here from time to time. The conversation deteriorated to subtle jabs immediately after his first post. He didn't know DIY or his qualifications....so what! Quit acting like a pack of Rabid Hyenas and give him a chance to fit in.


All right, arrogance may have been a strong word.

A quick search for DYI's posts would have shown his qualifications quite plainly. I think it is reasonable to do a basic search like that before saying what he said.

His idea was reasonable, and he was gently shown why it is not necessarily worthwhile. He was shown how he would only shrink the chamber by 20%, and that the addition of an actual liquid fuel injection.

DYI then gently explained that yes, fans help (and why), conceded that there could be advantages to using gasoline. He responded with a blatant challenge. I think Fnord's post on page 4 summarizes how all the experienced members felt.

He responded to aggression/frustration with more aggression. that is essentially what we have done, except we used facts to argue. It's not right, but its better.



Re-reading the thread, I take back my first line. You could be arrogant, naive or both.
  • 0

POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name :D
User avatar
ramses
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:50 pm
Reputation: 3

Unread postAuthor: RJB INDUSTRIES » Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:31 pm

Thanks velocity 3x... Please take a look on this, all of you... my vortex is the only picture i have in this computer of my BBMG...

http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/vortex- ... rt,15.html

I didn t know how to see what DYI did...so what...
Please check it and change the way of this conversation....

RJB INDUSTRIES
  • 0

User avatar
RJB INDUSTRIES
Sergeant First Class
Sergeant First Class
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:49 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Technician1002 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Reading this makes me think rule #1 got bent somewhat. :D
  • 0

User avatar
Technician1002
Chief of Staff
Chief of Staff
 
Posts: 5190
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
Reputation: 14

Unread postAuthor: jimmy101 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:48 pm

RJB, you are getting dissed because your original post looked like it was writen by an idiot.
I made a H2 reactor to adapt in a cannon but i sleep thinking on other thing... Why are we using gas as a fuel...
First place let´s compare the density of a gas with a liquid one...
What did Nasa when wanted increase the mass of fuel inside the fuel chamber in a shuttle...?
they began to use liquid fuel to could in the same volume hade much more fuel...
what i take and my revolutionary idea in this world is that we may use a liquid fuel and i have already thought in a simple way to do that...
remember one simple detail, look at the ergonomic point of a spud gun...??
WAF??
a gas bottle is so big and reduce quality of a cannon...
This year I will show you what i´m working on...

RJB INDUSTRIES

Even allowing for English not being your first language it comes across as idiotic. People tend to not respect idiots.

A "liquid fuel" is a brilliant idea? Give me a break. Been there done that. Works fine but is not really any better than a gaseous fuel, indeed it is more difficult and gives no real advantage. That is engineering speak for "it is a stupid idea if your goal is better performance".

The controlling characteristics of the energy in a combustion chamber is not the fuel. The actual choice of fuel has a fairly minor affect. The controlling variable is the amount of oxidizer. If you don't increase the amount of oxidizer then the energy in the chamber is basically the same regardless of the fuel. The heat of combustion of gasoline is basically identical to propane. The amount of air in the chamber for a gasoline fueled vs. propane fueled chamber is basically the same (4% of the chamber volume as injected gaseous propane is insignificant). Put those two concepts together, work out the combustion stoichiometry then look up the low heat values for combustion of various hydrocarbon fuels and you'll discover the fuel (butane, propane, hexane, gasoline, ...) has basically zero affect on the energy in the chamber.
  • 0

Image

jimmy101
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 3129
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 7

Unread postAuthor: Fnord » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:44 pm

OKAY,

With that I think we've pretty well demolished his original idea.
RJB, you can build it if you want, no one is stopping you, but it probably won't be revolutionary. Even if you only want a smaller fuel tank, you can make a custom propane cylinder from some off-the-self fittings.

If it was my call I'd say lets just throw this whole discussion out and give him a chance to start over.
RJB, How bout you get that vortex gun together and show us some shredded targets, mmkay? The block itself looks very well-crafted so I look forward to seeing what the rest will look like.
  • 0

User avatar
Fnord
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 2244
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:20 pm
Location: Pripyat
Reputation: 7

PreviousNext

Return to How-To Guide Database

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot]

Reputation System ©'