Login    Register
User Information
Username:
Password:
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Sponsored
Who is online

In total there are 66 users online :: 5 registered, 0 hidden and 61 guests


Most users ever online was 155 on Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:40 am

Registered users: Bing [Bot], farcticox1, Gussmoore, Majestic-12 [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Administrators
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

Super Slick Ammo (Literally)

Post about things you have launched or thought about launching. Also post about various materials used for building cannons. No posts about explosive projectiles!
Sponsored 
  • Author
    Message

Unread postAuthor: ALIHISGREAT » Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:43 pm

i do metric but imperial is not that hard to understand and its not that hard to roughly convert.
  • 0

User avatar
ALIHISGREAT
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 1779
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: UK
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: jimmy101 » Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:36 pm

ALIHISGREAT wrote:
jimmy101 wrote:I agree with Necrosis.

Fiddle around with GGDT, you'll find that friction has a pretty minor affect on the performance of a compressed air gun.


yes but it still affects the performance... and better performance is well... better.

That is kind of a simplistic view.

A gun shoots a $0.10 round at 400 FPS. Swtiching to a $1.00 low friction round (of the same mass and shape) increases the velocity to 410 FPS. Is it worth it?

Most spud guns are not all that consistent shot to shot. A 5% shot to shot variability is not uncommon. In order to measure the difference between 400FPS and 410FPS (a 2.5% difference) you would have to shoot the gun many times. A Student's T-test would be need to tell if the observed difference is real or just a result of random variation.

It is entireley possible that a low friction round would increase the muzzle velocity so little that the increase is unmeasurable. Indeed, that is about what GGDT predicts would happen.
  • 0

Image

jimmy101
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 7

Unread postAuthor: ammosmoke » Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:03 pm

hubb017 wrote:
ammosmoke wrote:Augh...So, I have to fricken convert it...


You could always learn both. :D


I know how to work the metric system, ie, 100mm=1 cm, 100cm=1 meter, 1000m= a kilometer...etc, but when I try to picture it in my head it just doesn't work. I see things in inches and feet. If somebody says "its 20 meters away" I go, hmmm, well thats over 60 feet, ok, now I understand how far away it is. Same pretty much goes with yards, because we don't use them very much. If somebody says 30mm gun, I think, hmmm, now a 9mm is this big, so how big is 30 again? Barrel length, 50mm, umm, how much is that in inches? I know cm-inches 3.54, but still, I like to be able to picture in my head how far it is without converting. That is why I wish everyone had one measurement to start out with.
  • 0

<img>http://www.speedtest.net/result/309559995.png</img>
User avatar
ammosmoke
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 1011
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:57 am
Reputation: 0

Previous

Return to Construction Materials/Ammo Discussion

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], farcticox1, Gussmoore, Majestic-12 [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]

Reputation System ©'