Login    Register
User Information
Username:
Password:
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Sponsored
Who is online

In total there are 60 users online :: 4 registered, 0 hidden and 56 guests


Most users ever online was 218 on Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:58 pm

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Administrators
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

Are civilian guns designed to jam?

All non-spudgun related discussion goes here such as projects, theories, serious questions, etc. All "off-topic" posts (aka useless posting, determined by moderators) will be removed.
Sponsored 
  • Author
    Message

Unread postAuthor: jrrdw » Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:05 pm

D_Hall wrote:Executions used to be public events where the condemned was exposed to "public opinion" on his way to the gallows. These days it's all very sterile and the condemned gets to keep his dignity.


I agree with that. We should be able to put them in the stockaids and throw rotten veggies at them...from a distance....with launchers. :D
  • 0

When life gives you lemons...throw them back they suck!
User avatar
jrrdw
Donating Moderator
Donating Moderator
 
Posts: 6540
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Maryland
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 25

Unread postAuthor: MrCrowley » Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:51 pm

The death penalty seems as if it's only useful for bargaining in the courts after the crime has been committed. I don't think it's a good deterrent for several reasons: (a) general lack of knowledge about state laws and in what circumstances you can get the death penalty; (b) death ain't really all that bad for some people if they're facing it in a relatively humane way, there are worse ways to die than by potassium chloride injection; (c) some criminals just wont care about death or only kill because they think they can get away with it.

Though I don't think the current judicial system meets the requirements to be able to determine whether a criminal should face the death penalty in most instances. I wouldn't want 12 people deciding what I have for lunch let alone whether a person is guilty of murder or not.

Neil deGrasse Tyson has talked about being thrown off the list of potential jurors because he asked why the judge read that the defendant was caught with 2000mg of cocaine and not 2g of cocaine. I think he also said there was another occasion where he wasn't accepted because they asked what he did for a living and he said he taught Astrophysics and courses like "Evidence and Reason" or something along those lines.

On another note, we have to watch what we say here. I know on this forum a debate about gun regulation could go on and on so try not to say anything that will spark a debate :wink:
  • 0

User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 10207
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Country: New Zealand (nz)
Reputation: 4

Unread postAuthor: jimmy101 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:31 pm

"Are civilian guns designed to jam"

As others have pointed out, cheap ammo, poor maintenance ...

Plus one more things. Guns for sporting or self defense use are rarely designed for sustained high rates of fire. It isn't all that difficult to design a gun for that use but it does add weight and cost to the weapon. The gun isn't "designed to jam" it is designed to be used in a particular way. If it is used in another way, e.g., too high a rate of fire, it will fail.

Even military weapons are designed to only operate reliably up to a certain firing rate. Exceed that rate and the gun will jam or fail in some way.
  • 0

Image

jimmy101
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 3130
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 7

Previous

Return to Non-Spudgun Related Discussion

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]

Reputation System ©'