Login    Register
User Information
Username:
Password:
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Sponsored
Who is online

In total there are 69 users online :: 5 registered, 0 hidden and 64 guests


Most users ever online was 155 on Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:40 am

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Administrators
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

over under air cannon

Post questions and info about pneumatic (compressed gas) powered cannons here. This includes discussion about valves, pipe types, compressors, alternate gas setups, and anything else relevant.
Sponsored 
  • Author
    Message

over under air cannon

Unread postAuthor: tape fist » Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:07 am

dose the over under method of building and air cannon cause less sufficient power and if so is it noticeable?
  • 0


tape fist
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:16 am
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: starman » Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:29 am

Theoritically, but not really measurable in practice. The type and size of valve you use, piston, sprinkler, qev, ball valve, etc and chamber size and barrel length have much more to do with real performance.

BTW - sufficient = efficient
  • 0

User avatar
starman
Donating Moderator
Donating Moderator
 
Posts: 3041
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:45 am
Location: Simpsonville, SC
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Hotwired » Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:29 am

No it's not noticeable from the viewpoint of a spudgunner.

Yes it is, in theory, not as good for compressed air to travel through a 180* bend as to flow straight through but...

1) All piston valves have at least a 90* turn in the gas flow when they are open, some can even be 180* turns so if you are using a piston valve you either have a ridiculous L shaped cannon or you go that extra 90* and have the chamber tucked in alongside the barrel.

2) A 4m long inline cannon or a 2m long over-under cannon. Same barrel, chamber and pressure, just that one is twice the length of the other and now can't fit in any of your storage rooms and for good measure is rather more bendy than the over-under as the barrel and chamber aren't supporting each other.


If you are using a valve such as a sprinkler valve or a burst disk it can be worthwhile making an inline cannon if the overall length isn't going to be too great anyway.
  • 0

User avatar
Hotwired
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:51 am
Location: UK
Reputation: 0

Return to Pneumatic Cannon Discussion

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot]

Reputation System ©'