Login    Register
User Information
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Who is online

In total there are 80 users online :: 4 registered, 0 hidden and 76 guests

Most users ever online was 155 on Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:40 am

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

Sprinkler valve flow increase ideas

Post questions and info about pneumatic (compressed gas) powered cannons here. This includes discussion about valves, pipe types, compressors, alternate gas setups, and anything else relevant.
  • Author

Sprinkler valve flow increase ideas

Unread postAuthor: rna_duelers » Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:31 am

Recently having looked into the field of cylinder head modifications it has crossed my mind to apply some techniques that are used in engines and use them on a sprinkler valve!As the valve itself is the largest bottleneck between the chamber and barrel.

-Adding material to reduce turbulent pockets.(epoxy :) )
-Removing material to reduce turbulence.
-Radius sharp edges for flow.
-Multi seat angles to increase flow due to reduced sharp raddiuses.
-Diaphragm seat reshaping.
-Diaphragm lightening.

All this is good in theory,but in may prove different in the field.Testing and more to come!

Anyone with ideas feel free to share.
  • 0

User avatar
Major General
Major General
Posts: 1740
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:07 am
Location: G-land Australia
Country: Australia (au)
Reputation: 1

Unread postAuthor: jackssmirkingrevenge » Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:19 am

You will get a performance increase, but I doubt it will be anything you can perceive without a chrony.

I'll wager that you would most likely see less than 10% increase in muzzle velocity, but if you have the time and inclination it would be great to see some real world data of a modified and unmodified valve.

You will need to keep all the other variables constant - chamber size, barrel length, projectile size and weight etc. - to get meaningful results, and a chrony is essential.
  • 0

User avatar
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 24225
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Country: Holy See (Vatican City State) (va)
Reputation: 66

Unread postAuthor: Technician1002 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:22 pm

Just a note on diaphragm weight: Don't try to shave the weight. Doing so may compromise the integrity while gaining little. The diaphragm is fast enough to open and close many times during a shot as evidenced by the number of cannons that "Honk". It is more important to modify the valve to vent the pilot much faster than the chamber can empty down the barrel. A slow pilot causes it to not keep up with the rate the chamber is vented, causing it to close early and then repeat, hence the honk.
  • 0

User avatar
Chief of Staff
Chief of Staff
Posts: 5190
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
Reputation: 14

Unread postAuthor: CS » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:38 pm

Good analysis, but why is a sprinker valve your starting point? A lot of DIY valves have performance in high regard, a sprinkler valve seems to have other priorities.
  • 0

User avatar
Donating Moderator
Donating Moderator
Posts: 1897
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:32 pm
Location: Southern Utah
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 4

Return to Pneumatic Cannon Discussion

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot]

Reputation System ©'