Login    Register
User Information
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Who is online

In total there are 89 users online :: 3 registered, 0 hidden and 86 guests

Most users ever online was 155 on Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:40 am

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

Dual valves

Post questions and info about pneumatic (compressed gas) powered cannons here. This includes discussion about valves, pipe types, compressors, alternate gas setups, and anything else relevant.
  • Author

Unread postAuthor: frankrede » Wed May 02, 2007 9:17 pm

The third gun would have slightly more power due to teh added chamber volume.
But with your insistence on crap valves it wouldn't make a difference.

but the first and third would perform best.
The first would be cheaper
  • 0

Current project: Afghanistan deployment
User avatar
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
Posts: 3220
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:47 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: SpudMonster » Wed May 02, 2007 9:20 pm

You will want a minimum amount of dead space between the valve and the projectile's ass end. Putting the valves in-line with the barrel would be a major improvement.
  • 0

User avatar
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:54 pm
Reputation: 0


Return to Pneumatic Cannon Discussion

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]

Reputation System ©'