Login    Register
User Information
Username:
Password:
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Sponsored
Who is online

In total there are 51 users online :: 5 registered, 0 hidden and 46 guests


Most users ever online was 155 on Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:40 am

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Administrators
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

Whats better? Pneumatic or combustion?which do ya like more?

A place to ask general spud cannon related questions.
Sponsored 
  • Author
    Message

Unread postAuthor: schmanman » Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:28 pm

no,why would we count them ?
  • 0

Persistence is a measure of faith in yourself
User avatar
schmanman
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:28 pm
Location: Michigan,U.S.A
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Velocity » Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:45 pm

Benny wrote:Not one reply to anser his question.... oh well.

Pneumatic: much greater range than a combustion, quieter, but less portable.

Combustion: portable, lower range than a pneumatic, and less loud.


...?
  • 0

User avatar
Velocity
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:42 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: dinsdale » Sun Aug 27, 2006 7:14 pm

pneumatics louder?
my pneumatic cannon with 6" of linear porting on the barrel just gives a low
'whoosh' when fired.
oxyacetylene in a steel pipe had my ears ringing for hours
  • 0


dinsdale
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:16 pm
Location: Bowmanville, Ontario (canada)
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Pressure_Tester » Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:56 am

thanks you guys, i have another questions. pneumatic or hybrid? cause im thinking of making a hybrid, i made one air pressure or really pneumatic, but the fisrt one was out of PVC, and the other was of copper piping, ill have photos for them soon.
  • 0


Pressure_Tester
Private
Private
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:32 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Benny » Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:56 am

rmich732 wrote:
Benny wrote:Not one reply to anser his question.... oh well.

Pneumatic: much greater range than a combustion, quieter, but less portable.

Combustion: portable, lower range than a pneumatic, and less loud.


...?


Oopss.... i meant more loud.
  • 0

Join the spudshot forum!!!!!

F*ck the bunny... i got a fishy ><>

Benny
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: rna_duelers » Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:00 am

Pneumatics all the way for me i like technical side of it and alot of people around here have no idea what a pneumatic cannon is so they go wow when they see it.But i do love that combustion boom and portability.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
rna_duelers
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 1740
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:07 am
Location: G-land Australia
Country: Australia (au)
Reputation: 1

Unread postAuthor: Pressure_Tester » Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:12 pm

yeah, pneumatics mean air or CO2 pressure right? just to make sure if im right or not.
  • 0


Pressure_Tester
Private
Private
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:32 pm
Reputation: 0

Sponsored

Sponsor
 


Unread postAuthor: Pete Zaria » Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:30 pm

  • 0

User avatar
Pete Zaria
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 978
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: Pressure_Tester » Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:42 am

hey thanks Pete Zaria
  • 0


Pressure_Tester
Private
Private
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:32 pm
Reputation: 0

Previous

Return to General Spud Cannon Related

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot]

Reputation System ©'