Login    Register
User Information
Username:
Password:
We are a free and open
community, all are welcome.
Click here to Register
Sponsored
Who is online

In total there are 73 users online :: 6 registered, 0 hidden and 67 guests


Most users ever online was 155 on Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:40 am

Registered users: Bing [Bot], BORIS_ELCIN, Google [Bot], mrfoo, MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] based on users active over the past 5 minutes

The Team
Administrators
Global Moderators
global_moderators.png CS

C:B ratio

A place to ask general spud cannon related questions.
Sponsored 
  • Author
    Message

Unread postAuthor: joannaardway » Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:28 am

That would be me that did the calculations - I thought it sounded damned familiar.

As I said there, don't use .6:1 or .7:1 - cutting a little bit off your barrel will actually increase power and muzzle velocity.

It sounded very strange to say, but that's what the maths told me.

I didn't really discover anything new (I just found extra proof of it), except what might be the ideal ratio for a fixed volume launcher - 1.25:1 or thereabouts. Not as efficent as .8:1, but perhaps more powerful.

I knew that bigger chamber increased power (with a given barrel), but I was interested to see if there was a "ceiling" to this power.
  • 0

Novacastrian: How about use whatever the heck you can get your hands on?
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
User avatar
joannaardway
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 949
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:57 pm
Location: SW Hertfordshire, England, UK.
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: sgort87 » Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:27 am

Ya know, the old Latke tests tell us that isn't true that cutting off the barrel to a .8:1 is better. It shows the highest velocity for lower-friction projectiles (spuds) to be from a .6:1 ratio.
  • 0

<a href="http://www.launchpotatoes.com"><img src="http://www.launchpotatoes.com/images/uploads/logo2.PNG"></a>
http://www.LaunchPotatoes.com
User avatar
sgort87
Donating Member
Donating Member
 
Posts: 1038
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:32 am
Location: Lockport, Illinois
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 1

Unread postAuthor: POS » Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:09 pm

iamthewalrus wrote:POS, the best C:B ratio for propane is .8:1, burntlake proved that, if u talking about anything other then propane idk. but for propane bigger chamber is not better.


I was talking about a pneumatic. I dont know sh*t about combustions.
  • 0

User avatar
POS
Major
Major
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:19 pm
Reputation: 0

Unread postAuthor: runningawaypyro » Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:12 am

ok so this is off topic but...

for a hybrid launcher i understand the extermal metering and ignition well but not sure about the materials. i know that i should use sch80pvc but is that just for the chamber and the barrel just use normal sch40pvc? becasue you are alowing the pressure to be released donw the barrel as the projectile leaves so you would think the barrel wouldnt have to be quite as strong but i dont know. Becasue i would like to build a very large scale hybrid such as around maybr 4' 4" chanber but i i have to buy all the barrel in sch80 wont that be really expensive. i live just down the street from the keller industrial headquaters were they nationaly supply all the keller stors but its still expensive. how much does sch80pvc ushewaly run?

thanks
  • 0


runningawaypyro
Specialist
Specialist
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:58 pm
Reputation: 0

Previous

Return to General Spud Cannon Related

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], BORIS_ELCIN, Google [Bot], mrfoo, MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot]

Reputation System ©'