<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="tahoma,verdana,arial" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
Ditto.....can anyone here provide empirical evidence for evolution?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Yep: the distribution of species across geography explanable only through plate tectonics (or is continental drift another crackpot liberal theory?). Please explain how, say, the Galapagos Island finches that Darwin observed gained those specific characteristics without any sort of inherited mechanism?
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="tahoma,verdana,arial" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">SHOW ME THE SCIENTISTS who was present 60 million years ago to make a visual observation of theories taken as fact today?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
SHOW ME THE DEITY who was present a few billion years ago to make a visual observation of the story taken (by you) as fact today?
A picture would be nice.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="tahoma,verdana,arial" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
Mt St Helen's and The Grand Canyon have more in common with Intelligent Design than evolution.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
No, they're both examples of geological evolution. Read up on your Lyell. And I'd hardly believe that having St. Helens would be an intelligent move. Way to go, God, you built a geological pipe bomb?
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="tahoma,verdana,arial" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">overwhelming evidence of Irreducible Complexity<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
What evidence? There is no evidence of irreducible complexity. Only evidence that people don't understand evolution.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="tahoma,verdana,arial" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
I think were Darwin alive today...when presented our technology today and with the overwhelming evidence of Irreducible Complexity...Darwin would retract his theory as he indicated when he presented his theory.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Behe did a pretty close job himself
"Behe additionally testified that the presence of irreducible complexity in organisms would not rule out the involvement of evolutionary mechanisms in the development of organic life."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducibly_complex
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="tahoma,verdana,arial" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
In the end of the day, if you believe in evolution, you are an Atheist. If you believe that Jesus came to die for you, you are a Christian.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
And how are those mutually exclusive?
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="tahoma,verdana,arial" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
How does it account for obvious flaws in "design"?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Easy. God invented ethyl alcohol, right? Clearly, he was drunk.
Why else would our sinuses be so poorly "designed"?
Don't forget the ol' dinos dying out (or was that a trick by satan to test us?:D)