Page 2 of 4

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:16 am
by mopherman
Matt221985 wrote:yes, the chamber is rated for 350 psi and the barrel is rated for 120 psi, i washed off all the lettering so thats why u cant see it...

As "hi" was saying i shouldnt go over 60 psi becuz of my fittings, if i were to use it at 60psi with the fittings already on there..how much power would i get from 60 psi out of a cannon this size? enough to throw a spud 200 yards or so?
At 60 psi, you should probably buy a sprinkler to get better performance. 1.5 ball valvs are a bitch to turn. (unless you got the meatl one)

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:53 am
by turbohacker
It probably would do 200yds, I do recommend switching the parts out for pressure rated parts though, that way if you use a ball valve then you could get the pressure safely to around 200psi. It is however a very nice gun, especially for your first, congrats!!! :D

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:08 pm
by Matt221985
thanks alot! yea, im gunna try it with 60 psi with what i have on it now when i get my ball valve(metal) and see how it does, but eventually change the fittings, only have $6 into the fittings, so no biggy

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:30 pm
by pyromaniac
the reduceing peice you need is a bushing you fit it inside a coupler. here a picture of the right reducer.

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:55 pm
by lukemc
fittings are cheap surgery isnt. but for safty sake just replace the parts.

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:45 pm
by Matt221985
Update:

Ok call me stupid but im keeping the fittings i have on it for now and the ball vavle is on, so when i go to test it tommorow should i put air in it and let it sit to see if anything is going to go wrong?

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:08 pm
by integral
Thats exactly the problem mate. You cannot determine the exact time or even a vague estimate to when it might fail. It could pop on the first time or 2 months down the track. If your test shows that it didn't fail, that would only make it more likely to fail the next time. If you value current way of life, don't play roulette and just replace the fittings.

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:35 pm
by Matt221985
ok, so its all done, now for those who know and see my fittings are wrong,,,Ive decided to use it for a low pressure gun, so nothing over 55 or 60 or maybe less. Gunna have a little fun with this one and then next pay day build a new one, the right way..

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:43 pm
by Matt221985
BTW, tomm is the big test, wish me luck :!:

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:46 pm
by hi
wrap the bad parts it in alot of duct tape, just incase. maybe 5 layers. if you have any chicken wire or mesh then go around with that too.

mesh on the inside and duct tape on the out side.

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:50 pm
by Matt221985
yea, black duct tape, i was thinking of painting it black, so itll match, lol

Whats everyone think about the looks of it, i think its ok for a first...

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:57 pm
by hi
for a first it looks good. much better than my first. i didnt know about this web site when i built my first, so as you can guess it sucked because i didnt have anything to base it one, hell i didnt even know that pvc glue existed. it was fun, but very ugly. i wound up using pvc (epoxy to glue the pvc), copper elbows that were epoxyed toogether and alluminum electrical pipe (not pressure rated) for the barrel. now that i think about it, mine did suck! but then again i

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:59 pm
by integral
Wasn't there a thread on spudtech rendering the use of duct tape/chicken wire useless for protecting the operator from shrapnel?

Looks very clean for a first, you should be proud.

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:26 pm
by Matt221985
integral wrote:Wasn't there a thread on spudtech rendering the use of duct tape/chicken wire useless for protecting the operator from shrapnel?

Looks very clean for a first, you should be proud.
is there ?

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:52 pm
by hi
there was one, but only for duct tape. with the use of mesh it will stop it.