Page 3 of 5

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:26 pm
by Demon
Will compressed aluminium foils work ?

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:35 pm
by Lentamentalisk
Not in the least. Think about it like this: if you can so much as put a dent in it, then a rocket engine, at insane temperatures, ridiculous velocities, and high pressures, will utterly destroy it. You would be better off with a washer (which is not a good choice btw, cuz it gets eroded too fast.)

Remember, this is a rocket, not a paper airplane. Its called rocket science for a reason. There is science behind it. You need something a little stronger than your average 3rd grader's paper mache (sp?) art project...

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:29 pm
by rp181
at home depot has 500 degree F epoxy putty, and it last awhile, wont be reusable though.

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:26 pm
by covey12
ok, that second comment is a bunch of shit, its not rocket science at the least, go to youtube and search how to amke a 2stage rocket motor, the fuel mixture (bcuz i dont think it tells you) is 3parts kno3 (stump remover) to 2 parts powdered sugar, mix it to gether well in a coffee grinder or pestle and mortar

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:54 pm
by Demon
Not in the least. Think about it like this: if you can so much as put a dent in it, then a rocket engine, at insane temperatures, ridiculous velocities, and high pressures, will utterly destroy it. You would be better off with a washer (which is not a good choice btw, cuz it gets eroded too fast.)



Well, he used cat litter and it works great...

I was thinking of clay.

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:26 pm
by devilman
haha that guy on youtube lives here in aus. I also use kitty litter for all my nozzles and plugs, then drill a hole thru them and the fuel till i reach my desired core length. I have had nozzles and plugs fail, ejecting fuel everywhere, but most cases that was my fault, either not compressing it enough, not having a thick enough plug, or deciding it would be a good idea to cook and cast the fuel straight into the pvc casing.

ive found kno3, sugar and sulfur work well together in the right ratios. the sulfur give the rocket extra power aswell as a neat spark trail when lit. Down side is it stinks to the high heavens :P

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:43 pm
by Hotwired
Demon wrote:Well, he used cat litter and it works great...

I was thinking of clay.
Cat litter is normally clay anyway but getting some moist clay and waiting for it to dry out will take considerably longer than compacting the pre dried grains of cat litter.

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:26 pm
by Lentamentalisk
exactly my point. I never said that you had to use expensive aerograde materials, and ceramic nozzles are ideal. I am just saying that Al foil is not exactly rocket engine material. Have you ever tossed Al foil into a fire? It melts. It melts really fast. You really don't want your nozzle to melt away in the first 1/8th of a second. In October Sky they used steel washers, and even those eroded too quickly (granted they had much larger rockets)

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:32 am
by Demon
I already stuffed down a 30 cm x 30 cm aluminium foil in the rocket catridge and it became as hard and big as an monney piece.a nail was not able to go trough.

Why do we have to make a hole trough the rocket motor?

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 2:02 pm
by mrbadexample
to make a controlled "burn", once it ignites, it'll work it's way up through the hole (i imagine the hole is part of the combustion chamber), otherwise it may self extinguish or explode. i never made a rocket. and i'm sure if the hole isn't centered, it'll fly funny, nobody has mentioned this so far. the hole should be perfectly straight down the tube, any deviance from dead center will result in skewed flight, no matter how many fins, the thrust will direct it in the direction of the hole.

the aussie kid with the sandals making the kitty litter rocket is funny, could be a new "saying"... "go pound kitty litter!" LOL

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 2:13 pm
by TurboSuper
Have you considered a hybrid rocket motor? They seem safer since there isn't anything inheriently explosive about 'em.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:01 pm
by Demon
Have you considered a hybrid rocket motor? They seem safer since there isn't anything inheriently explosive about 'em.
You are right! I Just have to spend 300$, buy dangerous, very dangerous propellants,machine titanium or tungsten and convince my dad to make it!

(my Dad is an engineer and is not stupid)

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:51 pm
by rp181
hybrid rockets are NOT safer.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:45 pm
by TurboSuper
Hur? Where do you get $300 and titanium and dangerous propellants? The one I saw used some PVC, some N20, and some ABS shavings.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:47 pm
by Fnord
I think the hole through the center has more to do with increasing the surface area of the propellant than controlling the burn. It will also keep the heat off of the pipe walls more than an engine without a hole.