SpudFiles

http://www.sevenforums.com/gaming/25528 ... ralia.html

wtf

What's Austrailia?

But seriously..shooting undead zombies makes a game so bad it must be banned? Go watch my bloody valentine alone at midnight.

Btw:

Rated R for graphic brutal horror violence and grisly images throughout, some strong sexuality, graphic nudity and language.

This is gonna be sent to theopia land I suspect.

You're playing l4d? I'm kinda much of an l4d addict myself, my other life besides spudding.

Any l4d players, feel free to add me
My steam account: http://steamcommunity.com/id/psycix

The PDF file indicates that the game was refused classification due to 'high impact violence' against 'living humans infected with a rabies-like virus' that is unsuitable for minors under the age of 18.

Zombies aren't alive, they're DEAD! (or undead)
This makes them suitable for target practice, as you can fire at moving targets, which splatter beautifully, while not being violent or harmful.

Actually, its unlawful to ban l4d on those grounds.
I mean, they've never banned (or can't ban) a game because of violence against things, only violence at living creatures.
Zombies, would actually be nothing more then an act of vandalism as they aren't alive. Thus shooting zombies shouldn't be banned...

Either way its straight up retarded.

I mean, they've never banned (or can't ban) a game because of violence against things, only violence at living creatures.

GTA isn't banned...and that nearly revolves around killing people. (anyone tried playing GTA without going on killing sprees?).

Hell. How is knocking someone to the ground by hitting them across the face with a rifle, then stabbing them in the chest not "high impact violance" in world at war.. Or when you're on the ground, stabbing them in the neck etc.

Probably caused by someone who sucked at zombie games when they were a kid.

The people responsible for the ban likely got PWNED by some kids at an internet cafe and this is their retaliation.

When the zombie apocalypse comes, we all know who are going to be turned first...


And if not, I'm not coming to save their asses, just let em try to ban the zombies.

What else do you expect from a monarchy?

Daltonultra wrote:What else do you expect from a monarchy?

Yes, the Queen surely had something to do with this

When the zombie apocalypse comes, we all know who are going to be turned first...

It's a global concern

jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:

Daltonultra wrote:What else do you expect from a monarchy?

Yes, the Queen surely had something to do with this

What I mean is; This is what happens when people are SUBJECTS rather than CITIZENS.

Daltonultra wrote:This is what happens when people are SUBJECTS rather than CITIZENS.

That much we can agree upon. When one doesn't even have the constitutional right to bear virtual arms against pixellated zombies, something is very wrong.

the constitutional right to bear virtual arms

I liked that one.


But uhmmm, nobody here plays left 4 dead? I think I'm going to shoot some zombies right now....

psycix wrote:But uhmmm, nobody here plays left 4 dead? I think I'm going to shoot some zombies right now....

Er... what's the point of shooting something that's already dead

I'm currently going through Kane and Lynch again, brilliant stuff especially with my massive fuçk-off graphics card

Im playin world at war. Juggernoobs and the overpowered mp40 is annoying but oh well. So is hardcore tdm, martyrdom, second chance, people shooting through floors... etc.

www.theopia.com Know it, love it, live with it!