Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:59 am
Most "liberals" arn't interested in the control of firearms.
(and technicaly, those who do arn't liberals. Look of the damn word.)
Not all conservatives are interested in loosening restrictions on firearms.
Take frik'n George as an example.
(ok, george might not count as a conservative. Whatever.)
Use correct terminology and call them "anti-gunners" or a related word.
Alienate fewer sympathetic liberals.
________
Nice pistol. What's the magazine capacity?
I'm not so sure about the "old ammo" excuse - you might want to check the headspacing.
On an unrelated note, do you guys figure it would be legal for a normal individual to manufacture some "washers" and a "odd hollow tube", and turn those over to a suitably licenced gunsmith for assembly into a silencer?
Of course, the tax stamp would still be paid.
Just wondering, because I've been considering (eventualy - a few years) getting one, and I don't really want to pay the 600-1000$, PLUS STAMP that they sell for.
(and technicaly, those who do arn't liberals. Look of the damn word.)
Not all conservatives are interested in loosening restrictions on firearms.
Take frik'n George as an example.
(ok, george might not count as a conservative. Whatever.)
Use correct terminology and call them "anti-gunners" or a related word.
Alienate fewer sympathetic liberals.
________
Nice pistol. What's the magazine capacity?
I'm not so sure about the "old ammo" excuse - you might want to check the headspacing.
On an unrelated note, do you guys figure it would be legal for a normal individual to manufacture some "washers" and a "odd hollow tube", and turn those over to a suitably licenced gunsmith for assembly into a silencer?
Of course, the tax stamp would still be paid.
Just wondering, because I've been considering (eventualy - a few years) getting one, and I don't really want to pay the 600-1000$, PLUS STAMP that they sell for.