cp-100 sprinkiler valve
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:46 pm
how much can a modded cp-100 sprinkler valve hold and would tis be better then my 1/2 in. brass ball valve?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:04 pm
A sprinkler valve is DEFIANTLY better than a ball valve performance wise, and they can hold a decent amount of pressure( i dont know the exact number.)
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:18 pm
They've been taken up to 160PSI but I wouldn't recommend it, not because of the sprinkler valve but because of the PVC chamber on the cannon. (If your cannon has PVC pipe or fittings for the chamber).
If it did fail, it'd be the diaphragm, so it's not that dangerous unless you dump unregged CO2 in it.
Most are rated for 120-125PSI.
If it did fail, it'd be the diaphragm, so it's not that dangerous unless you dump unregged CO2 in it.
Most are rated for 120-125PSI.
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:02 pm
Really?dudeman508 wrote:A sprinkler valve is DEFIANTLY better than a ball valve performance wise, and they can hold a decent amount of pressure( i dont know the exact number.)
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:40 pm
Yeah, DFENAINTILLY! A sprinkler is DEFNIANTLY better then a ball valve.Really?
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:55 pm
ive had 1000 behind my 1/2 brass one (loud)
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:16 pm
I think he was joking....Quote:
Really?
Yeah, DFENAINTILLY! A sprinkler is DEFNIANTLY better then a ball valve.
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:32 am
Ofcourse he was. So was I.