Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:31 am
Clearly puberty has yet to kick in properly, wait a few years young grasshopper
I knew it would happen the second I saw him holding the gunThe scope almost hit your eye
Page 55 of 61
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:47 am
Can you imagine my reaction when I first saw the photo and thought the hairs were coming from somewhere elsepneumaticcannons wrote:With hairs coming from the crack?
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:03 am
my wife thought the same thing!
you're horrible!
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:12 am
Petitlu, we're all horrible, and perverted. That's why we're on the internet.
Great work, and I second JSR, you need more eye relief on the scope, or put the shoulder pad back a bit.
Or should I say the barrel shroud
Great work, and I second JSR, you need more eye relief on the scope, or put the shoulder pad back a bit.
Or should I say the barrel shroud
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:22 am
I will change at the level of support of the shoulder
the telescope will also be changed as it will be placed on a CZ
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 11:41 am
Clearly puberty has yet to kick in properly, wait a few years young grasshopper
glad I haven't gotten that far yet
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 2:30 pm
I just changed the brake disc in my car, so I now have the next target of Thorjack!
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 4:46 pm
A shooting video with the step of reloading
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 3:39 am
Disk 22mm:
Diagram :
Diagram :
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 4:00 am
thats a lot of cameras
Though I think it may be better to shoot @ 420 fps.
My logic being, 1000 or 420, you are still barely going to see the projectile. Filming my excuse of a hybrid with an 8x mix, at 1000 fps, I am barely able to tell the direction of the projectile and your using 40x mixes
I doubt the water will slow the projectile of your choice down much either.
Though I think it may be better to shoot @ 420 fps.
My logic being, 1000 or 420, you are still barely going to see the projectile. Filming my excuse of a hybrid with an 8x mix, at 1000 fps, I am barely able to tell the direction of the projectile and your using 40x mixes
I doubt the water will slow the projectile of your choice down much either.Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 4:14 am
At 1000 fps you do not see the projectile?
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 4:58 am
Not really... this is the best I ever got, and that's with a large and relatively slow (sub 300 fps) projectile:Petitlu wrote:At 1000 fps you do not see the projectile?
[youtube][/youtube]
That being said, after it penetrates the plate, it should have slowed down sufficiently to make for some nice footage going through the aquarium. Yes, I'm confident it will have no problems going through the plate
The one change I would suggest is to remove Canon I and put it looking down the barrel, so that you have at least one camera looking directly at the plate.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 5:25 am
ok I do like that for the camera!
I have to buy the aquarium, missing him!
I have to buy the aquarium, missing him!
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 5:27 am
wow... you're going to buy an aquarium to shoot at? ehehe that's dedication
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 5:32 am
For science !
€ 10 an aquarium ...
€ 10 an aquarium ...