Manometric metering
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 319 times
lets take a hypothetical chamber of 100mL which we will be fuelling with propane. We have a 10mL meter to do this with. a correct fuel to air ratio is 96 air:4 propane
The chamber needs 4mL of propane (4% of the chamber volume) per mix.
Say we want to fill it to 5x, so the total volume of propane we need is 4 x 5 = 20mL of propane at atmospheric pressure.
We need to factor in the volume of the meter too though, so total volume is 100mL + 10mL i= 110mL. 4% of this is 4.4mL of propane.
For a 5x mix therefore, we need 4.4 x 5 = 22mL of propane at atmospheric pressure.
We have a 10mL meter, which will hold 10mL of propane at atmospheric pressure. We want 22mL though, so 22/10 = 2.2
This means we need to pressurise the meter to 2.2 bar (32 psi). Once we do this, then open the valve between meter and chamber, we will have the correct amount of propane in the chamber.
Now, we need the right amount of air, so we pressurise the chamber to 5 bar (74 psi)
Voila, correct mix.
What's important to know is how much air and fuel you need in your chamber, then there are various ways to go about it.
Important to know that the pressure values I gave are absolute. Most pressure gauges will read zero at 1 bar/14.7 psi.
This means in our case that for the fuel metering, even though you want 2.2 bar in the chamber, you will actually fill it until the needle reads 1.2 bar (ie 2.2 bar - the 1 bar of atmospheric pressure it's already reading.
Assuming you have your dead volumes and venting sorted out, it's not a big deal.
Personally, I prefer syringes
The chamber needs 4mL of propane (4% of the chamber volume) per mix.
Say we want to fill it to 5x, so the total volume of propane we need is 4 x 5 = 20mL of propane at atmospheric pressure.
We need to factor in the volume of the meter too though, so total volume is 100mL + 10mL i= 110mL. 4% of this is 4.4mL of propane.
For a 5x mix therefore, we need 4.4 x 5 = 22mL of propane at atmospheric pressure.
We have a 10mL meter, which will hold 10mL of propane at atmospheric pressure. We want 22mL though, so 22/10 = 2.2
This means we need to pressurise the meter to 2.2 bar (32 psi). Once we do this, then open the valve between meter and chamber, we will have the correct amount of propane in the chamber.
Now, we need the right amount of air, so we pressurise the chamber to 5 bar (74 psi)
Voila, correct mix.
What's important to know is how much air and fuel you need in your chamber, then there are various ways to go about it.
Important to know that the pressure values I gave are absolute. Most pressure gauges will read zero at 1 bar/14.7 psi.
This means in our case that for the fuel metering, even though you want 2.2 bar in the chamber, you will actually fill it until the needle reads 1.2 bar (ie 2.2 bar - the 1 bar of atmospheric pressure it's already reading.
Assuming you have your dead volumes and venting sorted out, it's not a big deal.
Personally, I prefer syringes
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 319 times
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Fnord
- First Sergeant 2
- Posts: 2239
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:20 pm
- Location: Pripyat
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Waitwait.
You gave him very detailed instructions for volumetric metering.
Manometeric simply means attaching a very sensitive gauge to the chamber and pumping fuel in... judging how much fuel you've added by the pressure increase. Isolate the gauge when adding air/firing.
In this case,
14.7 psi = 1 chamber volume of fuel = ~ ~25x,
7.35 psi = 1/2 chamber of fuel = ~12.5x, etc.
Rough numbers. It's not too hard to figure out if you understand the basic concept.
You gave him very detailed instructions for volumetric metering.
Manometeric simply means attaching a very sensitive gauge to the chamber and pumping fuel in... judging how much fuel you've added by the pressure increase. Isolate the gauge when adding air/firing.
In this case,
14.7 psi = 1 chamber volume of fuel = ~ ~25x,
7.35 psi = 1/2 chamber of fuel = ~12.5x, etc.
Rough numbers. It's not too hard to figure out if you understand the basic concept.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 319 times
There will always be some dead space down the line, which has to be taken into accountFnord wrote:You gave him very detailed instructions for volumetric metering.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Fnord
- First Sergeant 2
- Posts: 2239
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:20 pm
- Location: Pripyat
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
I think you've got me confused now.
I guess I should have just posed this in the first place.
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/hybrid- ... 13602.html
Volumetric is covered first, manometric is in the 'part 2' section,
I guess I should have just posed this in the first place.
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/hybrid- ... 13602.html
Volumetric is covered first, manometric is in the 'part 2' section,
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:There will always be some dead space down the line, which has to be taken into account
Same here, can't tell if you're being sarcastic because I don't see why there would be any dead space in a manometric setup.Fnord wrote:I think you've got me confused now.
I'm a manometric fundamentalist, I can't see me going back to the poor-man's metering
In case no one realises, I am taking the piss. There's a time and a place for volumetric metering, neither of which I've yet encountered. It is good if you're using a syringe though.
I think JSR is talking about dead space in the pump system used to fuel the gun. After you fill with propane (which works as expected). Once you hook your air pump to the chamber and open the valve, some of the propane/air mix flows back into the pump/hose, up to the check valve. You need to consider this in your metering.
I'm not sure if pumping several bar of air through this system would make the propane lost negligible. I would be inclined to think no; the chamber and pump hose would reach an equilibrium of concentration. the amount of propane that was correct for just the chamber is now divided between the pump hose and the chamber proportionally.
I think this is addressed in the syringe fueling link
I'm not sure if pumping several bar of air through this system would make the propane lost negligible. I would be inclined to think no; the chamber and pump hose would reach an equilibrium of concentration. the amount of propane that was correct for just the chamber is now divided between the pump hose and the chamber proportionally.
I think this is addressed in the syringe fueling link
POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name
Even if both lines are attached to the meter at all times, there is still a small problem: due to the geometry of the fueling lines, mixing to equilibrium will be a slow process. As such, it is desirable to make the chamber volume large in comparison to the total volume of the fuel meter in a manometric metering system.
I ran into substantial trouble with this when I started building small hybrids, and it still causes design headaches. Essentially, without very expensively rebuilding my meter, I can't decrease chamber volume like a want to, substantially increasing build cost (and time).
I ran into substantial trouble with this when I started building small hybrids, and it still causes design headaches. Essentially, without very expensively rebuilding my meter, I can't decrease chamber volume like a want to, substantially increasing build cost (and time).
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
Would a check valve after the chamber ball valve help? As DYI mentioned, I sort of relied on the large chamber volume and small meter volume to negate this problem and on my smaller hybrid I would fuel it a touch richer than normal.ramses wrote:I think JSR is talking about dead space in the pump system used to fuel the gun. After you fill with propane (which works as expected). Once you hook your air pump to the chamber and open the valve, some of the propane/air mix flows back into the pump/hose, up to the check valve. You need to consider this in your metering.
I'm not sure if pumping several bar of air through this system would make the propane lost negligible. I would be inclined to think no; the chamber and pump hose would reach an equilibrium of concentration. the amount of propane that was correct for just the chamber is now divided between the pump hose and the chamber proportionally.
I think this is addressed in the syringe fueling link
This all depends on meter geometry. If you have a "cross" type meter with oxidizer, fuel, gauge, and chamber ports which is always open throughout, you may actually break even depending on the hose lengths.Would a check valve after the chamber ball valve help? As DYI mentioned, I sort of relied on the large chamber volume and small meter volume to negate this problem and on my smaller hybrid I would fuel it a touch richer than normal.
If you have a "tee" type meter the mix would tend toward rich, unless you fueled "backwards" (oxidizer and buffer first).
Of course, there's the issue with fuel mixes as well. With hydrogen as a fuel (and possible buffer) it would be natural to fill "backwards". Given the tremendous assortment of possible propellant mixes (and my obstinate refusal to assume the use of air/propane ), it's not really possible to give a categorical answer here without going on for pages.
Either way though, the check valve you mention (regardless of what you mean by "after") would probably exacerbate the matter, owing to its cracking pressure.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
- Labtecpower
- Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1297
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:38 am
- Location: Pyongyang
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
but if you have a check valve BEFORE the meter, no dead volume would have to be calculated, right?
like a check valve between the fuel and the metering chamber, and a check valve between the air/oxidizer supply.
like a check valve between the fuel and the metering chamber, and a check valve between the air/oxidizer supply.
- wyz2285
- First Sergeant 2
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:50 am
- Location: Porto, Portugal
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
As soon as you remember the check valve`s minimum opening pressure, a check valve will solve the dead space problem. In my case, I have never had any of these problem
CpTn_lAw wrote: "yay, me wanna make big multishot pnoob with 1000 psi foot pump compressor using diamond as main material. Do you think wet bread make good sealant? "