Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:15 pm
by Hotwired
spanerman wrote:damn Rednecks....what makes it even worse is that it was a crappy cannon...anything with decent power woulda killed that little guy instantly insted of injuring him.... all hail mr frog
I don't know...

I mean if it was a powerful cannon the lil mite would've been killed by the forces but because it's a crap cannon, it survived and went on to be further tortured...

"I ran out of spuds and wanted to amuse my mates" isn't, in my opinion, a valid reason to fire frogs.

Nor does the fact that someone's a chav mean they have carte blanche to attach a hamster to a rocket and launch fire it.

Small animals are not projectiles :evil:

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:22 pm
by jrrdw
I don't think this should have been posted.

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 5:55 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
While I'm glad some of you see the funny side, and yes it's "just a frog", you cannot justify baseless animal cruelty. If the frog was a pest and was dispatched instantly with a load of buckshot from a spudgun, well and good. But needlessly causing distress as in this case is not my idea of fun.