Something which might be of interest, in spite of the primitive filming:
[GVideo]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0504732539#[/GVideo]
Note that the principle of cooling gasses to suppress noise is more applicable to combustions and hybrids than pneumatics.
edit: updated link
[youtube][/youtube]
Suppressor Tutorial
-
jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
-
inonickname
- First Sergeant 4
- Posts: 2606
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:27 am
The only reason I see to have a suppressor is neighborhood courtesy; and even then shooting a gun is rather loud.
Though the bang is half the fun, and can be useful. For example i use a non ammo firing burst disk gun to scare parrots and all of that out of our fruit trees. Don't need to kill them but do need to get rid of them...
Might use it on my next combustion, thanks JSR
Though the bang is half the fun, and can be useful. For example i use a non ammo firing burst disk gun to scare parrots and all of that out of our fruit trees. Don't need to kill them but do need to get rid of them...
Might use it on my next combustion, thanks JSR
PimpAssasinG wrote:no im strong but you are a fat gay mother sucker that gets raped by black man for fun
-
Lentamentalisk
- Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:27 pm
- Location: Berkeley C.A.
[quote=JSR]Note that the principle of cooling gases to suppress noise is more applicable to combustions and hybrids than pneumatics.[/quote]
not just more applicable, they will actually harm the performance, because most gases leave the barrel at cold temperatures. When they come in contact with the steel wool, or what ever, they will actually heat up...
not just more applicable, they will actually harm the performance, because most gases leave the barrel at cold temperatures. When they come in contact with the steel wool, or what ever, they will actually heat up...
Do not look back, and grieve over the past, for it is gone;
Do not be troubled about the future, for it has not yet come;
Live life in the present, and make it so beautiful that it will be worth remembering.
Do not be troubled about the future, for it has not yet come;
Live life in the present, and make it so beautiful that it will be worth remembering.
-
SubsonicSpud
- Specialist 2
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:55 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Great Find JSR 8) Certainly demonstrates some simple methods of suppression.
SubsonicSpud
SubsonicSpud
-
jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
... as well as the versatility of epoxy, woo!SubsonicSpud wrote:Certainly demonstrates some simple methods of suppression
-
SubsonicSpud
- Specialist 2
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:55 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:... as well as the versatility of epoxy, woo!
*facepalm*
-
ALIHISGREAT
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
- Location: UK
i gave up after like 10minsEddbot wrote:that was long... I got to the end and realized i'd been staring at it for 45 minutes...
its a good find though!
<a href="http://www.bungie.net/stats/halo3/defau ... player=ALI H IS GREAT"><img src="http://www.bungie.net/card/halo3/ALI H IS GREAT.ashx"></a>
Thanks JSR, for this great find.
After watching the whole 45min. I build this...
2mm thick aluminium tube, 2 brass fittings, steel wool and foam spacer.
And yes it really works well on a pneumatic. It takes away the sharp crack above 200 psi.
After watching the whole 45min. I build this...
2mm thick aluminium tube, 2 brass fittings, steel wool and foam spacer.
And yes it really works well on a pneumatic. It takes away the sharp crack above 200 psi.
-
jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
So I saw and nicely done, glad to have been of inspirationMRR wrote:After watching the whole 45 minutes I build this...
-
THUNDERLORD
- Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:42 pm
I scanned over it, But there's no way I will watch 45+ minutes on something so elementary.
Didn't notice mention that the first .22 silencer patented actually stated on the patent that it's purpose was disposal of pests from hen houses without causing the chickens to drop their eggs!
Also didn't notice mention of attachment by boring out the end of barrel, threading the inside, and attaching silencer with male threads into female threaded barrel.
Also no mention (I noticed) of using rubber baffles sandwiched between metal baffles (or fender washers) a method that is capable of reducing the sound enough to hear the firing pin strike and ejection/ slide spring only.
which brings me to the statement near the end that it was " impossible to reduce the sound to be unnoticeable" which was incorrect , well except for hearing projectile impact.
Most of those designs were very crude and could be maximized for size reduction as well as noise reduction based on personal experience .
But the basics were covered.
BTW, Anything spud related I would be sure to permanently attach to avoid confusion.
Or not possess either since it's still an "Iffy" situation... 8)
Didn't notice mention that the first .22 silencer patented actually stated on the patent that it's purpose was disposal of pests from hen houses without causing the chickens to drop their eggs!
Also didn't notice mention of attachment by boring out the end of barrel, threading the inside, and attaching silencer with male threads into female threaded barrel.
Also no mention (I noticed) of using rubber baffles sandwiched between metal baffles (or fender washers) a method that is capable of reducing the sound enough to hear the firing pin strike and ejection/ slide spring only.
which brings me to the statement near the end that it was " impossible to reduce the sound to be unnoticeable" which was incorrect , well except for hearing projectile impact.
Most of those designs were very crude and could be maximized for size reduction as well as noise reduction based on personal experience .
But the basics were covered.
BTW, Anything spud related I would be sure to permanently attach to avoid confusion.
Or not possess either since it's still an "Iffy" situation... 8)
-----SPEED,STRENGTH, AND ACCURACY.-----
"Procrastination" is five syllables for "Sloth".
Theopia 8)
Born To Be Alive!
"Procrastination" is five syllables for "Sloth".
Theopia 8)
Born To Be Alive!
nice find JSR
Forum Rules - follow them or else!
“Happiness is the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and end of human existence”
“Happiness is the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and end of human existence”
-
jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
I agree that it's basic and incomplete, however it's a good start for those with absolutely no concept of what a silencer is and no clue how to build one.
...perhaps because such suppressors have a considerable effect on performance and accuracy as well as needing much more maintenance.
Also no mention (I noticed) of using rubber baffles sandwiched between metal baffles (or fender washers) a method that is capable of reducing the sound enough to hear the firing pin strike and ejection/ slide spring only.
...perhaps because such suppressors have a considerable effect on performance and accuracy as well as needing much more maintenance.
I agree there, especially with some of the better suppressed 0.22" riflesout there.which brings me to the statement near the end that it was " impossible to reduce the sound to be unnoticeable" which was incorrect , well except for hearing projectile impact.
