Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:54 am
chosen_way, my ET friend tells me "take me to your reefer!".
"I assure you that my "opinion" is not just that"
Possibly you took my assertion that you must be Jesus a bit to serious?
"but what I and many other members see. In other words, I speak for many in what I say."
Mer... Ive had several PM and IM me with there thanks. There requests that I clean up there topic, so they can get a fricken' answer and not some drifting which turns into "fork off spudstuff". (Wasnt that specific response, but a example of what it is, seeing as my memory is failing me) So Id have reason to believe that I was "backed" in my decision, I also still think so, but obviously understand the numbers are a different. Heck, some of these people I have claimed of "heavy moderating" I maintain almost daily IM's. I think when these people understand what Im doing is to improve the forum, there down with it and understand its not about them, but the forum in whole.
"I really do think you would be getting a lot more crap if you were an average new member right now."
Possibly, but not banned. This speculation of what would have happened is rather wasteful in time, quite simply discussing things in both past tense and of speculation, is again wasteful, so I wont care to discuss it further. I guess you can try your hand at why we should keep discussing it...
"Your reply to my final statement made no sense."
One dumbed up version coming up! Maybe not, not sure if I wanna type that much.
"This is not an argument about who does better work or anything like that. It is about reasoning and judgment. Lately, I think you have gone a bit extreme. I don't want you to just slow down; I want you to UNDERSTAND."
Its not. I think I clearly exploited that in the surrounding body of text. Ive clearly understood that and hence why im setting the moderating to "low". Im not going to engage in any "deletion" and such seeing as the controversy is to great. I see other mods keep a rather low pro, and dont take "crap". I personally dont want to further get caught up in the debate off how to moderate. Believe it or not when people did object to my moderations, it did infact take a toll.
PC, im rather bothered when dont expect good things for the forum. Always referring to this place as "noob haven" in essence. Id venture to speculate that your low expectations of the forum, could have serious impact on how these forums have gone. Higher standards produce better results. Ive always loved the imagination and ingenuity thats thrived here, and hoped that could be coupled with a refinement in how they were exchanged. I give a crap about this forum, hence why my post count at ST is ~150, and here its ~950. Only stopping in for political discussions in general most of the time. I could ramble on more, but ill save it for the possible next post.
"To go with what BLB said on kicking up topics, I mean the reply should have to be real stupid to get flamed for kicking something up."
I see people post pics of a soccer guy getting racked in the nards, but are suttle reminders that "kicking" is frowned upon for its content, is not tolerated.
"However we also have the right to bear arms but we don't walk around with AK-47's."
First off we should, but lovely politicians limit there availability. Either way, you never set a perimeter to what my limits were. Yes, im sorry for ruining my welcomness, but in all trueness, I wasnt attempting to stretch the rules.
"but when pimpmann made this post comming off as if he's DR on SpudTech going on a mass deleting/locking rampage, I reacted. I want my mods to keep the place clean, but not go nuts... know what I mean?"
I in no way am trying to copy DR. Ill admit I dont hate him like I used to, but I disagree on a lot of stuff he does. I hate how he is idolized and in truth would probably deterred from copying him for the simple fact. I understand you, and I will keep a extremely low-pro as far as moderating.
"I think in your initial post of this thread you sounded like you were trying to be a real hardass, when indeed your not."
Hardass=stern When did you get the idea I wasnt a hardass
"I assure you that my "opinion" is not just that"
Possibly you took my assertion that you must be Jesus a bit to serious?
"but what I and many other members see. In other words, I speak for many in what I say."
Mer... Ive had several PM and IM me with there thanks. There requests that I clean up there topic, so they can get a fricken' answer and not some drifting which turns into "fork off spudstuff". (Wasnt that specific response, but a example of what it is, seeing as my memory is failing me) So Id have reason to believe that I was "backed" in my decision, I also still think so, but obviously understand the numbers are a different. Heck, some of these people I have claimed of "heavy moderating" I maintain almost daily IM's. I think when these people understand what Im doing is to improve the forum, there down with it and understand its not about them, but the forum in whole.
"I really do think you would be getting a lot more crap if you were an average new member right now."
Possibly, but not banned. This speculation of what would have happened is rather wasteful in time, quite simply discussing things in both past tense and of speculation, is again wasteful, so I wont care to discuss it further. I guess you can try your hand at why we should keep discussing it...
"Your reply to my final statement made no sense."
One dumbed up version coming up! Maybe not, not sure if I wanna type that much.
"This is not an argument about who does better work or anything like that. It is about reasoning and judgment. Lately, I think you have gone a bit extreme. I don't want you to just slow down; I want you to UNDERSTAND."
Its not. I think I clearly exploited that in the surrounding body of text. Ive clearly understood that and hence why im setting the moderating to "low". Im not going to engage in any "deletion" and such seeing as the controversy is to great. I see other mods keep a rather low pro, and dont take "crap". I personally dont want to further get caught up in the debate off how to moderate. Believe it or not when people did object to my moderations, it did infact take a toll.
PC, im rather bothered when dont expect good things for the forum. Always referring to this place as "noob haven" in essence. Id venture to speculate that your low expectations of the forum, could have serious impact on how these forums have gone. Higher standards produce better results. Ive always loved the imagination and ingenuity thats thrived here, and hoped that could be coupled with a refinement in how they were exchanged. I give a crap about this forum, hence why my post count at ST is ~150, and here its ~950. Only stopping in for political discussions in general most of the time. I could ramble on more, but ill save it for the possible next post.
"To go with what BLB said on kicking up topics, I mean the reply should have to be real stupid to get flamed for kicking something up."
I see people post pics of a soccer guy getting racked in the nards, but are suttle reminders that "kicking" is frowned upon for its content, is not tolerated.
"However we also have the right to bear arms but we don't walk around with AK-47's."
First off we should, but lovely politicians limit there availability. Either way, you never set a perimeter to what my limits were. Yes, im sorry for ruining my welcomness, but in all trueness, I wasnt attempting to stretch the rules.
"but when pimpmann made this post comming off as if he's DR on SpudTech going on a mass deleting/locking rampage, I reacted. I want my mods to keep the place clean, but not go nuts... know what I mean?"
I in no way am trying to copy DR. Ill admit I dont hate him like I used to, but I disagree on a lot of stuff he does. I hate how he is idolized and in truth would probably deterred from copying him for the simple fact. I understand you, and I will keep a extremely low-pro as far as moderating.
"I think in your initial post of this thread you sounded like you were trying to be a real hardass, when indeed your not."
Hardass=stern When did you get the idea I wasnt a hardass