Difference between revisions of "EVBEC"
(+overveiw, +physics model, +limits, +use) |
(-typo) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
From these assumptions, one can get the driving equation of EVBEC: | From these assumptions, one can get the driving equation of EVBEC: | ||
| − | + | v<sub>simulation</sub>=v<sub>test</sub>/SQRT((S<sub>test</sub>/S<sub>simulation</sub>)/(M<sub>test</sub>/M<sub>simulation</sub>)) | |
Where: | Where: | ||
Revision as of 00:27, 11 February 2006
EVBEC stands for "Energy & Volume Based Estimator for Combustions", and is intended to calculate the muzzle velocity of combustion launchers. The latest version (V 1.2) can be downloaded from spudfiles right [
Physics model
EVBEC assumes that:
- Energy produced from combustion is directly porportional to chamber volume.
- The portion of this energy utilized in a launcher is directly derivable from the Chamber to barrel ratio.
- The latke tests are accurate.
From these assumptions, one can get the driving equation of EVBEC: vsimulation=vtest/SQRT((Stest/Ssimulation)/(Mtest/Msimulation))
Where:
- v is velocity
- S is chamber volume
- M is mass
Using this, the velocities are calculated for all the ratios tested by latke, and the proper ratio to use to find the velocity is indicated on a graph.
limits of the physics model
The physics model does not account for the following:
- Differing burn times
- Variations in efficiency caused by different projectile masses. (which is why the 1.5" data is "out there")
- Odd effects caused by launcher design (ie; breach restrictions).
Several of these problems are likely to be alleived when the results of some recent tests being carried out by pimpmann22 of the spudfiles forums are relesed.
use
Directions for use are provided in the documentation of the program.
