Most Efficient Projectile Shape

Potatoes last one shot, so build reusable! Discuss ammo designs and ideas. Tough to find cannon part or questions? Ask here!
salasd
Private
Private
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:26 pm

Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:33 pm

the best shape i know of is called the sears hackbody, which looks like a cigar with pointed tips on each end. its best for areas around the super sonic speeds but i think its should be ok. somthing simpler though, golfballs
User avatar
Lentamentalisk
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1202
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Berkeley C.A.

Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:54 am

Salasd, the closer observer would notice that golf balls have already been mentioned exactly 15 times in this article already (not counting quotes.) Before you post an obvious answer, check to make sure that answer hasn't been posted 15 times...
Do not look back, and grieve over the past, for it is gone;
Do not be troubled about the future, for it has not yet come;
Live life in the present, and make it so beautiful that it will be worth remembering.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Donating Members

Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:44 pm

Interesting footnote to this from the wikipedia article on nosecones that Rag had linked to, an excel calculator that will design one for you, meant for model rocketeers but certainly applicable to spudgun projectiles for those seriously interested in long range.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Labtecpower
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Eritrea
Posts: 1297
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:38 am
Location: Pyongyang
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:42 pm

I looked back one page, and I saw rag talking about ice bullets.
(JFK kill theory)
What if they made a bullet out of bone, or frozen meat / gelatine / other body tissue? I think they would have better mechanical strength than just plain water, and aren't tracable.

Wat do you guys think about this?
User avatar
Hotwired
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:51 am
Location: UK

Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:40 pm

Labtecpower wrote:I looked back one page, and I saw rag talking about ice bullets.
(JFK kill theory)
What if they made a bullet out of bone, or frozen meat / gelatine / other body tissue? I think they would have better mechanical strength than just plain water, and aren't tracable.

Wat do you guys think about this?
Firing bone or dead meat hasn't got much going for it aside from being rather grisly.

The untraceable bit of an ice bullet is that it melts and thus leaves no evidence. The practical side of making and firing one is another matter.

If you're going for something with mechanical strength you might as well go the whole hog and use metal, either way forensics have something to examine.
User avatar
ramses
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
United States of America
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:50 pm

Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:10 pm

Now that this has been kicked up, I have to mention that no-one has talked about skin drag. Torpedoes achieve low(er) drag with cavitation. As long as the fins are out of the cavity, this shouldn't hurt stability.
POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name :D
User avatar
ilovefire
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 511
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 6:48 am

Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Labtecpower wrote:I looked back one page, and I saw rag talking about ice bullets.
(JFK kill theory)
What if they made a bullet out of bone, or frozen meat / gelatine / other body tissue? I think they would have better mechanical strength than just plain water, and aren't tracable.

Wat do you guys think about this?
been tested by the myth busters with both frozen meat and ice, if i remember correctly the ice just turned to steam and the meat was more of a mince shotgun, both non lethal, altho they did only use firearms dont know how they would have gone in a air gun
why make it if it dosent shoot?
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Donating Members

Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:58 am

ramses wrote:Now that this has been kicked up, I have to mention that no-one has talked about skin drag. Torpedoes achieve low(er) drag with cavitation. As long as the fins are out of the cavity, this shouldn't hurt stability.
wikipedia wrote:Supercavitation is the use of cavitation effects to create a large bubble of gas inside a liquid.
... so not really relevant to spudguns unless you've made a speargun ;) unless it's possible to create a vacuum bubble - but surely, if there were a simple way to do this, we would have seen in on military projectiles already?

Still, bloody hell!

[youtube][/youtube]

On the subject though, one other drag-reducing concept not mentioned in this thread is the "base bleed" idea, though really if you're going to do that, might as well make a rocket assisted projecile.
(JFK kill theory)
Very interesting documentary including a detailled ballistic test showing the "single bullet theory" to be feasible, and talk of ice bullets to be a little silly ;)

[GVideo]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 2571189886#[/GVideo]
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
POLAND_SPUD
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5402
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:05 am

"base bleed" idea, though really if you're going to do that, might as well make a rocket assisted projecile.
that sounds feasible... well sort of
if you really want the max range possible you might turn the projectile into a steam rocket
Children are the future

unless we stop them now
User avatar
ramses
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
United States of America
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:50 pm

Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:15 am

Somewhere I read that you can also get air to cavitation. Perhaps I was mistaken.
POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name :D
User avatar
Technician1002
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5189
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am

Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:31 am

You can. That is the cause of sonic booms. Supersonic flights result in areas in vacuum.
User avatar
saefroch
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
Posts: 1679
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:47 am
Location: U.S.A.- See Map

Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:43 pm

Technician1002 wrote:Supersonic flights result in areas in vacuum.
I assume you're talking about the rarefaction that travels behind the buildup of sound waves that occurs around the object. Certainly an interesting proposal, but to make significant use of that I'd think you need a significant sound source, which most aerodynamic projectiles do not create.

But still, isn't it possible to create a region of far lesser pressure with a specifically designed projectile?
Post Reply