We explained to this same guy the difference between "shít" and "sheet" and he was so conscious of the fact that wanted people to know he was referring to a "sheet" of paper that he would say "sheeeeeeeeeeeet", most amusingGun Freak wrote:

We explained to this same guy the difference between "shít" and "sheet" and he was so conscious of the fact that wanted people to know he was referring to a "sheet" of paper that he would say "sheeeeeeeeeeeet", most amusingGun Freak wrote:
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Gents, sounds great. So you machine an example part. You realize the sear has a clearance issue. You want to trim off .015" or .016" off one wall of a pocket. Oh, and the pocket should be .025 deeper. How do you work these issues? Maybe the pivot pin location has to move a few thou one way or another. You find the endmill plunges too hard and has a tendency to break off or load up. How do you address that? Being the guy that runs the USG Factory, I am asked to jump hoops. I see limitations with what you propose. Oh, and almost 97% of our parts are not mirror image. Maybe you guys can help me see it your way with better examples. Thickness on a 2D part does not make it 3d or a surfacing job.evilvet wrote:Yeah, that's one of my favorite examples on the site.
Bear in mind, a height map that:Will produce you two clam shell halves. It's not 3D CAD CNC but it is 2.5D and works very nicely for making 3D parts.
- * Has perhaps only three levels rather than fifty or more
* Has one of it's levels at zero, i.e. penetrates the material
* Is made twice, the second time as a mirror image
A quick demo herewith
Edit: BTW to put CamBam in with MS Paint is a bit harsh. It will do pretty much anything the DIY hobbyist would want included pocketing, and 3D profiling.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Not in productivity but excellent precision is attainable. You want a part that looks good, fits good and works well.evilvet wrote:I am not suggesting a $3000 home made unit is going to compete with a Bridgeport mill"
Thanks, I might just take you up on that as I progress, thought freight from US to Oz might beat me.but if you are in a bind to machine something for your machine, we can certainly have a look.