My Flying Wing
I voted for the plane, if you're wondering. In my opinion, if it's really that tail-heavy it'd be hard to do much about it in flight.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26216
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Isn't it the pilot's job to correctly balance the plane before attempting a test flight?saefroch wrote:I voted for the plane, if you're wondering.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Ah yes but at that point he isn't the pilot, is he? I only considered him the "pilot" during the duration of the flight. But it was a design flaw, nonetheless.
- velocity3x
- Corporal 4
- Posts: 828
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:09 pm
- Location: Yuma, Arizona
- Contact:
FAA considers the preflight (including weight and balance) inspection to be the pilots responsibility.saefroch wrote:Ah yes but at that point he isn't the pilot, is he? I only considered him the "pilot" during the duration of the flight.
- jrrdw
- Moderator
- Posts: 6572
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
- Contact:
Being as how the entire vehicle is a wing I can see why it would be a judgement call on the CG. If it where my build I would have tried to get it in the center as close as possible. That would give you a dead center stick.
I stand corrected. Pilot's fault.velocity3x wrote:FAA considers the preflight (including weight and balance) inspection to be the pilots responsibility.saefroch wrote:Ah yes but at that point he isn't the pilot, is he? I only considered him the "pilot" during the duration of the flight.
Feel better?

- velocity3x
- Corporal 4
- Posts: 828
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:09 pm
- Location: Yuma, Arizona
- Contact:
I really don't care so, I don't feel anything about it.saefroch wrote: I stand corrected. Pilot's fault.
Feel better?

- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
In that design, much like flying parachutes, consideration must be given for the fact the prop is not inline with the CG, but it way below it. If the wing has high drag, the thrust will impart a strong nose up rotation to the craft at slow speeds (near stall) that will make for an extreme unstable condition leading onto a positive feedback loop into a stall condition.
Part of the solution is to add considerable down thrust to the engine to reduce the thrust induced nose pitch up.
This may be why it launched OK then failed. It got sufficient ground speed to fly, The climb out was too steep resulting in nearing a stall condition, the nose up tendancy rapidly put the craft into a stall.
The three errors were two design related including CG and down thrust issues and one pilot error of the climb angle and loss of speed resulting in the stall.
Yes, I do some RC too.
Due to the pilot responsibilites, this is mostly a pilot error.
The flying field seems to be improper for a shakedown flight. Too may obstructions and the risk to the public was an issue. Another 2 votes for Pilot error. Is there a local flying field that is open for RC and not boxed in by apartment blocks and trees?
Part of the solution is to add considerable down thrust to the engine to reduce the thrust induced nose pitch up.
This may be why it launched OK then failed. It got sufficient ground speed to fly, The climb out was too steep resulting in nearing a stall condition, the nose up tendancy rapidly put the craft into a stall.
The three errors were two design related including CG and down thrust issues and one pilot error of the climb angle and loss of speed resulting in the stall.
Yes, I do some RC too.
Due to the pilot responsibilites, this is mostly a pilot error.
The flying field seems to be improper for a shakedown flight. Too may obstructions and the risk to the public was an issue. Another 2 votes for Pilot error. Is there a local flying field that is open for RC and not boxed in by apartment blocks and trees?