SpudFiles

Cool
But are you on drugs, the sig makes me think you are

Drugs are bad mmmkay?

watto,
sorry to be a hard ass but your avatar and pot sig was giving me ceasures (spell check can't find right word).

RULES:
- Graphics may not contain any quick repeated flashing that would cause an annoyance for the casual viewer.

STHORNE wrote:watto,
sorry to be a hard ass but your avatar and pot sig was giving me ceasures (spell check can't find right word).

RULES:
- Graphics may not contain any quick repeated flashing that would cause an annoyance for the casual viewer.

well ill take this as a great chance to say that your sig and avatar gives me the sh*ts with the flashing red stars and glowing name

and yes i agree that watto should not have that in his sig but you are noone to state the rules unless you abide by them yourself

Carlman wrote:well ill take this as a great chance to say that your sig and avatar gives me the sh*ts with the flashing red stars and glowing name

and yes i agree that watto should not have that in his sig but you are noone to state the rules unless you abide by them yourself

mine isn't as fast and bright to the extent of annoyance. And if you ask me, its more soothing than repetitive/annoying.
Your's is the only complaint I've gotten on my avatar ever since I put it up (about 5 months).

But w/e....I'm thinking about changing it anyway...

STHORNE wrote:ceasures (spell check can't find right word).

If you want to know for future, it's spelt seizures.

- Graphics may not contain any quick repeated flashing that would cause an annoyance for the casual viewer.

I have to agree with this - as I've already used Firefox's ad block (ok, why if I do that as one word does it get censored by the forum?) attachment to remove them. There are rather few animated avatars I don't block to be honest - STHORNE's current one is an exception.

Same goes for images in sigs - I'll look at them the once, then I'll get Firefox to take them out to avoid cluttering the forum layout, and slowing the page loading.
Actually, I think that sig might be too large on the pixel dimensions too.

Ragnarok wrote:There are rather few animated avatars I don't block to be honest - STHORNE's current one is an exception.

Wait, so you block my avatar? Cause the way you worded it, it sounds like a double negative..

Ragnarok wrote:Actually, I think that sig might be too large on the pixel dimensions too.

My sig?

STHORNE wrote:Wait, so you block my avatar? Cause the way you worded it, it sounds like a double negative..

No, yours I don't block. There was indeed a double negative.

My sig?

Nah, Watto's pot sig - I've just gone and looked, and there's a 90 pixel limit on the height. At 134 pixels tall, Watto's is outside the limits.

STHORNE wrote:

Carlman wrote:well ill take this as a great chance to say that your sig and avatar gives me the sh*ts with the flashing red stars and glowing name

and yes i agree that watto should not have that in his sig but you are noone to state the rules unless you abide by them yourself

mine isn't as fast and bright to the extent of annoyance. And if you ask me, its more soothing than repetitive/annoying.
Your's is the only complaint I've gotten on my avatar ever since I put it up (about 5 months).

But w/e....I'm thinking about changing it anyway...

i havnt said anything because im not one to complain, quite a few annoy me but thats just my picky nature

thanks rag i just remembered that rule, i put up my asc sig pic below my other pic so that makes it too large ill change it now

EDIT: damn it double post, sorry guys

yeah...well since this is my 750th post, I get a blue star, thus will change my avatar/sig, ok?

You copied my flashing seizure text animation like 2 days after I put it up STHORNE how can you object to my other one that doesnt flash as much?




...
Drugs are bad mmmkay, If you do drugs... your bad mmmkay

watto wrote:You copied my flashing seizure text animation like 2 days after I put it up STHORNE how can you object to my other one that doesnt flash as much?

It's not so much the signature, rather the problem is the flashy Scarface avatar.

wow really... well thats the last thing I thought anyone would care about

Good work Ragna 1500 posts!

watto wrote:

Camdaman12 wrote:Looking good Watto cant wait to get to get mine finished should be good for a first.

Don't you mean 'ours' I've had more input into that gun of yours than you yourself... so it should be perfect then

Haha, that is true but it is still mine but i have to thank you so much for all the help since it did go through many different design stages but its all good now and cant wait to come to perth to get all the stuff i need to get this one finished.

Should be a good one either way.

Cameron

EDIT: i dont know why you guys turnign this topic about Watto new piston gun into this big disscusion about his wicked Scarface avatar and yes i know the rules, but come on its the coolest avatar on here to me personally so if someone who is known to have seizures caused by some fast flashing images they would always be awhere of what he or she is looking at, But it is still good that it is in the rules to stop it from happening be acciedent. But come on is just a little avatar of scarface killing some pissed off drugys)lol had to put that in there).

so to me i dont care about avatars and what not and like Ragnarok said you can just block them through Firefox.

but now my rant is over so go about you reading.