Just a thought to throw out there.
I've only seen it done a handful of times, but, with a completely sealed piston, equalization can be accomplished by simply running a piece of pipe or tubing from the pilot area to the chamber, with a ball valve in between.
So, I got to thinking. With the ball valve there, you would have to open to fill, and then close the ball valve before firing.
If the flow between the pilot area and chamber with the ball valve open is greater than the flow of your pilot valve, this would also act as a safety. As long as the ball valve was open, your pilot valve couldn't drop the pilot pressure enough to actuate the piston.
Of course, you could always add an inline check valve instead of the ball valve for no safety and automatic equalization.
Not the most bulletproof safety, but I believe it should work.
Manual Piston Equalization Safety Benefit
- mark.f
- Sergeant Major 4
- Posts: 3627
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: The Big Steezy
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
- Contact:
- Attachments
-
- This is a completely sealed piston with equalization accomplished with a ball valve and some 1/8" pipe.
- modpiston.png (6.58 KiB) Viewed 2120 times
-
- This is a standard piston with one-way equalization accomplished by a floating o-ring.
- floatpiston.png (4.81 KiB) Viewed 2118 times
- Gaderelguitarist
- Corporal
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:56 pm
- Location: Columbia, MD
- Contact:
I don't think that shape could be made with threaded fittings. It is a solid method of creating a safety though.
so many muchness
- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
It will work. Too large of a leakage path past the piston is often a noob reason some air cannons won't fire.
The ratio of the OD of the piston to the diameter of the barrel seal will play a large role in how much lower the pressure behind the piston must be before the piston will move. The closer the valve seat is to the OD of the piston, the lower the pressure in the pilot must drop before it will fire on a barrel sealing valve.
The drawing above shows a good example of a large diameter seat in relation to the OD of the piston. It won't take much bypass leakage to prevent that piston from opening.
This WiKi page has more information on the relationship of the valve seat to diameter and the pilot pressure drop required to open it.
http://www.spudfiles.com/spud_wiki/inde ... mon_traits
The ratio of the OD of the piston to the diameter of the barrel seal will play a large role in how much lower the pressure behind the piston must be before the piston will move. The closer the valve seat is to the OD of the piston, the lower the pressure in the pilot must drop before it will fire on a barrel sealing valve.
The drawing above shows a good example of a large diameter seat in relation to the OD of the piston. It won't take much bypass leakage to prevent that piston from opening.
This WiKi page has more information on the relationship of the valve seat to diameter and the pilot pressure drop required to open it.
http://www.spudfiles.com/spud_wiki/inde ... mon_traits
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
My first piston launchers used separate chambers and airtight pistons, but they were a bother. Don't you think having a "safety" is a little redundant on a spud cannon though?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- mark.f
- Sergeant Major 4
- Posts: 3627
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: The Big Steezy
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
- Contact:
Good point, although in practicality terms I would have used tubing anyways.Gaderelguitarist wrote:I don't think that shape could be made with threaded fittings. It is a solid method of creating a safety though.
I build most of my valves using this principle. My early valves needed a fairly large pilot valve since I used no o-rings. The valve I've made most frequently is a 2" piston 1-1/2" barrel size (in PVC), and this one is no different. (My copper launcher used a 1" piston and 5/8" OD seat, though, which is why it was much easier to pilot with a small ball valve.)Technician1002 wrote:The ratio of the OD of the piston to the diameter of the barrel seal will play a large role in how much lower the pressure behind the piston must be before the piston will move. The closer the valve seat is to the OD of the piston, the lower the pressure in the pilot must drop before it will fire on a barrel sealing valve.
Well I think it would be a bother, having to fill from two points. For this one: 1.) Make sure ball valve is closed. 2.) Open fill valve. Piston will seat. 3.) Open equalization valve. Fill. Close equalization valve when ready to fire.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:My first piston launchers used separate chambers and airtight pistons, but they were a bother. Don't you think having a "safety" is a little redundant on a spud cannon though?
Safety's are a little redundant but I almost put a large chunk of chocolate through my face once.
- FighterAce
- Specialist 2
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:28 pm
- Location: Croatia/Zagreb
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
- Contact:
You don't need to fill from two points for a 100% sealing piston. This is how I did it.mark.f wrote: Well I think it would be a bother, having to fill from two points. For this one: 1.) Make sure ball valve is closed. 2.) Open fill valve. Piston will seat. 3.) Open equalization valve. Fill. Close equalization valve when ready to fire.
Safety's are a little redundant but I almost put a large chunk of chocolate through my face once.
For safety its a good idea to have a ball valve between your main valve and the barrel. Yes it adds dead space but with high performance piston valves who cares for a little bit of dead space... its like asking whats more important... your life or extra 10 fps
“The combined synergy of a man and rifle is matchless.
The steadiness of hand, the acuity of vision and finally
the art of knowing how to make the rifle an extension of the
body all equate to the ultimate synthesis of man and machine.”
The steadiness of hand, the acuity of vision and finally
the art of knowing how to make the rifle an extension of the
body all equate to the ultimate synthesis of man and machine.”
- Gun Freak
- Lieutenant 5
- Posts: 4971
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Been thanked: 7 times
He never said that... The first picture he posted was of a piston with built in check valve achieved by floating o-ring.FighterAce wrote:You don't need to fill from two points for a 100% sealing piston. This is how I did it.
@ Mark, I've seen it done before, but it is a good idea. Still I don't think it's worth it when you can just make a built in check valve with floating o-ring, which is what I always so, but sure it's another option.
OG Anti-Hybrid
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!