A few first hybrid thoughts
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:15 pm
I recently became interested in building a hybrid (at least at some point in the future) but I still have a few issues floating around in my head before I commit to trying to design one. Hopefully you guys with more experience can help me out.
My goals include using some sort of piston valve/air spring setup for a reasonably quick firing cycle. I would also like it safe enough to be hand held at maybe 2x-4x mixes (after extensive remote tests) with a max load of anywhere between 5-8x. I'm planning using a 2"x12" sch 40 steel chamber with a 0.75"x60" aluminum or copper barrel. The fueling system will most likely be manometric. I'm assuming the primary ammunition will be marbles or something similar.
The main design issues will likely be the following:
*Fittings: I have read that run-of-the-mill malleable iron fittings (although only rated to 150psi) are safe for most guns with under 10x mixes. However, I want to be sure since I'm looking for something that can be held and fired with some margin of safety.
*The piston: From what I've seen, piston hybrids have been built multiple times now with good success. Nonetheless, I think this will be by far the biggest design challenge. I'll need something that can seal very well with the barrel and air spring while being strong enough to handle the extreme pressures. I don't have the ability to weld or machine highly customized components nor do I have the budget to have this done for me. The piston will need to be highly improvised yet work well. Aside from this, using a piston also seems like it will have its advantages. The opening pressure could be adjustable (through the air spring pressure) to work optimally for each mix number. I also believe a relatively high "burst" pressure could be achieved without a high-pressure air spring as long as the valve porting isn't much wider than the valve seat. This would keep the net directional force on the piston low until near-peak firing pressure is reached at which point the barrel seal would finally break. Of course, the air spring must then do its job as a cushion and (hopefully) prevent the piston from slamming into the back of the valve. The only other issue might be a small amount of pressure left in the chamber after firing due to the piston closing before it could all be released. However, I would assume that the projectile would be long gone before this happens and causes some performance-killing vacuum effect.
*Compactness: I don’t want my cannon to become too heavy or bulky. Using a manometric fueling system should eliminate the problem of having metering pipe sprawling from my gun. I’m guessing I could simply attach a ball valve/pressure gauge/quick connect to the end of the chamber through which both the fuel and air could be delivered and measured with the single gauge. The ball valve could then be closed in order to protect the gauge and quick connect valve from damage.
*Ignition: Stun guns are banned where I live, but I have found that electric BBQ igniters work pretty well. I was able to achieve a reliable 4-gap setup with one in my advanced combustion cannon. Perhaps I could make an improvised “spark plug” by somehow using epoxy to secure one or both of the igniter wires into a small 1/4” or 1/8” NPT pipe nipple. The nipple could then be screwed through a fitting into the chamber and viola! Of course, the epoxy would need to be strong enough to handle the firing pressure (not sure about this). Has anyone tried anything similar?
I'm really only posting my thoughts. I had a long/boring day at work to think about how I could build a hybrid and this is pretty much the result. I won't have time to actually build this thing until at least next year, but it's fun to think about.
My goals include using some sort of piston valve/air spring setup for a reasonably quick firing cycle. I would also like it safe enough to be hand held at maybe 2x-4x mixes (after extensive remote tests) with a max load of anywhere between 5-8x. I'm planning using a 2"x12" sch 40 steel chamber with a 0.75"x60" aluminum or copper barrel. The fueling system will most likely be manometric. I'm assuming the primary ammunition will be marbles or something similar.
The main design issues will likely be the following:
*Fittings: I have read that run-of-the-mill malleable iron fittings (although only rated to 150psi) are safe for most guns with under 10x mixes. However, I want to be sure since I'm looking for something that can be held and fired with some margin of safety.
*The piston: From what I've seen, piston hybrids have been built multiple times now with good success. Nonetheless, I think this will be by far the biggest design challenge. I'll need something that can seal very well with the barrel and air spring while being strong enough to handle the extreme pressures. I don't have the ability to weld or machine highly customized components nor do I have the budget to have this done for me. The piston will need to be highly improvised yet work well. Aside from this, using a piston also seems like it will have its advantages. The opening pressure could be adjustable (through the air spring pressure) to work optimally for each mix number. I also believe a relatively high "burst" pressure could be achieved without a high-pressure air spring as long as the valve porting isn't much wider than the valve seat. This would keep the net directional force on the piston low until near-peak firing pressure is reached at which point the barrel seal would finally break. Of course, the air spring must then do its job as a cushion and (hopefully) prevent the piston from slamming into the back of the valve. The only other issue might be a small amount of pressure left in the chamber after firing due to the piston closing before it could all be released. However, I would assume that the projectile would be long gone before this happens and causes some performance-killing vacuum effect.
*Compactness: I don’t want my cannon to become too heavy or bulky. Using a manometric fueling system should eliminate the problem of having metering pipe sprawling from my gun. I’m guessing I could simply attach a ball valve/pressure gauge/quick connect to the end of the chamber through which both the fuel and air could be delivered and measured with the single gauge. The ball valve could then be closed in order to protect the gauge and quick connect valve from damage.
*Ignition: Stun guns are banned where I live, but I have found that electric BBQ igniters work pretty well. I was able to achieve a reliable 4-gap setup with one in my advanced combustion cannon. Perhaps I could make an improvised “spark plug” by somehow using epoxy to secure one or both of the igniter wires into a small 1/4” or 1/8” NPT pipe nipple. The nipple could then be screwed through a fitting into the chamber and viola! Of course, the epoxy would need to be strong enough to handle the firing pressure (not sure about this). Has anyone tried anything similar?
I'm really only posting my thoughts. I had a long/boring day at work to think about how I could build a hybrid and this is pretty much the result. I won't have time to actually build this thing until at least next year, but it's fun to think about.