Haha good point, I mean why do we need to know how much damage a gun does to a person...i think there is some kind of evil plan going on here....
But actually it would be cool to compare the damage of different things. You dont really need something with the consistancy of flesh to compare shots.
Balistic gel.
it would still be cool to have something the consistenty as flesh, that way we can know the damage it would do to a person without actually shooting someone(duh)
in the upcoming presidential election, there will be several candidates who will be running, one of whom is Hillary Clinton. Now WAIT A SECOND!!! I though there was some sort of rule that prevented someone from serving more than two terms in office. Vote Against Hillary: Presidential Elections 08
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
ABCs, I point at google and say "ballistics gelitin" + "round"
...because, yes, ballistics gellitin stops bullets faster than you might expect. (or maybe not... I dunno what you expect)
Also:
http://www.tacticalshotgun.ca/ballistics_rifle.html
http://www.brassfetcher.com
...because, yes, ballistics gellitin stops bullets faster than you might expect. (or maybe not... I dunno what you expect)
Also:
http://www.tacticalshotgun.ca/ballistics_rifle.html
http://www.brassfetcher.com