SpudFiles

i just want to hear the opions of others one what they think is the best, or if one is not better then the other, then which is better in different fields, like speed, accuracy, portability, power, low cost, noise level, which is easyer to silence or dampen? and what is the best material, because my pvs spud gun worked good and had alot of power, but i also made one of copper piping, that one is fun to shoot, not as much power though, but more durable.

-Moved

Wrong section...

You know how many times this has been discussed? We need a sticky discussion...

Combustion is more fun because of the noise level. Pneumaticsare way more powerful and accurate and powerful and may have more speed. As you can see Pneumatics are way better

Oh not this again

Lol "Oh not this again" .

pnumatic

pnumatic? Thats a new one.

But pneumatics are alot better in my opinion.

Mostly because you can shape the chambers to make them feel more like a real firearm.

stop being an a$$hole. I forgot to hit spell check. you have insulted me several times already. I am fed up with you. I forgot the "e", is that a crime?

I kinda agree he just forgot an e. Anyway i like pneumatics.

your fed up with me? oh no im teribley sorry.

LucyInTheSky wrote:your fed up with me? oh no im teribley sorry.

Spelled Terribly, not Teribley.

Before attacking people for missing a E, why don't you first take a small look to your spelling?

Back on the subject, if there was PVC SCH40 Non-Cellular Core pipes in my area, I would of made a pneumatic.

LucyInTheSky please stop being a f-ing sarcastic a$$hole

Stop crying everyone! Im making a sticky on the issue right now, so keep your panties untangled for ~1 hour please!

has anyone counted how many times this "which is better" type thread has been posted?

Not one reply to anser his question.... oh well.

Pneumatic: much greater range than a combustion, quieter, but less portable.

Combustion: portable, lower range than a pneumatic, and less loud.