Page 1 of 1

Supah valves...

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:40 am
by killagorrila99
I found this model somewhere on the web, This is for all the people that want to build one!

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:59 am
by CS
That is not what the inards of a supah look like at all... The similarities stop at the 'T config' of the valve. A supah is chamber sealing, while the diagram is barrel sealing. A supah uses o-rings and a piston, while the digaram uses a diaphram. There was actual pictures at one point in time. Although I dont feel like going and fetching the link for such photos.

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:20 am
by killagorrila99
DAMN! I cant believe i got it wrong... is there anyone that can persaid joel to let us get his plans?

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:39 am
by MrCrowley
even if you got the pic killa unless your skilled with a lathe you cant build them,well thats what ive heard, you need lathe skills.

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:28 am
by mark.f
well, thats what ive heard, you need lathe skills
No, you need a lathe. :wink:

Besides, all the Supah valve is is a really high quality chamber sealing valve.

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:37 am
by MrCrowley
yeah but even if you have a lathe you still need to know how to use it.no point having one if you dont know how to use it. :roll:

ok lets settle this right now, im pretty sure there would only be one or two people capable on this site of building the supah.....if they had plans and a lathe(with lathe skills :wink: )

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:00 pm
by boilingleadbath
You could probably teach the averag 12-year-old to use a lathe in a manner of hours. It's not that difficult to machine plastics.

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:00 pm
by L.J.R
You could probably teach the averag 12-year-old to use a lathe in a manner of hours. It's not that difficult to machine plastics.
Yeah its fairly easy, I have only done it once quickly without the cutting tools but When using a file, sandpaper and rasp material comes of real easy and nicely.

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:20 am
by MrCrowley
well everyone just says joels valve is hard to replicate and requires alot of skills

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:17 am
by sgort87
There's a difference between "skills" and "skillz". Joel has got skillz.

The difference lies in the precision and the creativity of the machinist.

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:50 pm
by boilingleadbath
He's working oversized barstock, so that eliminates the effort of precise chucking.
He then does some simple machining operations. (O-ring cutting, turning, facing, some low-precision boring)
This barstock then happens to be PVC (or maybe type-two PVC) neither are hard to work with, at all. Nice surface finish just <i>happens</i> with them, if you get my exageration, and they are rigid but fairly soft.
He then drills some holes and taps them. Again, into PVC, so it's not a really difficult activity (although I admit that tapping does take some skill)

Wow - I'd have to go to an institution for 18 months to learn how to do that!
Give me a break - none of the operations are difficult, nor will bad things happen if you have a radius .002" too big/small.
Conventional work with a fair margain for error - sounds like a fine project for someone with a few hours of lathe use behind them.

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:19 pm
by benstern

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:36 pm
by mark.f
Holy crap! There's a picture of my 2" tee in that article!

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:32 am
by sgort87
Lathing is one thing, but designing something for lathe work is another. You wanna hear it BLB? Fine. You have lathe skillz. Guess what though. Most people don't.