jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:PotatoNick wrote:Where I disagree with you is the reason for having lift of up to .50d(or any value greater than .25d) . I don't believe that much, if any, piston bounce occurs during the time a projectile is in the barrel because you have so much force constantly being applied from the pressure pushing the piston backwards I would think that it would more than cancel out any opposing force from the very low spring rate of PVC.
I used to agree religiously with that view, however my change of heart is explained in reasonable detail
here.
I think that it is important to note that you were using pressures well above 125 PSI (you used a high of 400 PSI to prove your point), which is usually the standard maximum pressure to be used in a PVC pneumatic. Your figures at 100 PSI, while not completely convincing (considering the disparity between the greatly upscaled size of your larger launcher and the relatively low gains), seem to show that piston bounce is not a huge factor at lower pressures. Besides, there must be some other mitigating factors when you compare a spudgun of one size to a spudgun of another, especially in this case, where the weight of the piston probably exceeds the weight of your entire gun
EDIT: Just some more thoughts
clide wrote:To reduce bounce you would want to decrease the size of the piston relative to the barrel...Which also has the benefit of making the gun more efficient.
Also, considering that piston bounce was related to the "honking" of a sprinkler valve in that thread that you provided, it would suggest that a larger pilot valve was needed. However...I don't think that is the case in this situation (piston valve being actuated by a piston valve being actuated by a sprinkler valve).
...I can't believe I needed to look up how to fix "honking" in a sprinkler valve...man it has been a LONG time since I used one.