This is my pneumatic and it has a 3" chamber 24" long. There are 2 3/4" sprinkler modified for pneumatic actuation by the blowgun. I have 2 barrels to use with gun. A 2.5" tennis ball barrel 48" long and a 1.5" barrel 48" long. I use these barrels on this gun and on my combustion. Damage pictures will come later.
EDIT: Posted damage pictures.
My dual valve pneumatic-The Pimpinator
- spudgunnerwryyyyy
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:54 pm
-
Novacastrian
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:59 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
That looks like it could do some cool damage, nice gun although i'm leaning towards "hating" the paint job. In my opinion a camoflauge pattern would be the nuts. I also like that you use two valves.
I shall rate it a 8 out of 10- two points deducted for the wacky paintjob
I shall rate it a 8 out of 10- two points deducted for the wacky paintjob
- thespeedycicada
- Specialist 4

- Posts: 429
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:28 am
sweet gun the paint job looks like a candy cane though 
- spudgunnerwryyyyy
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:54 pm
Thanks guys this was easier than camouflage.
More comments please.
More comments please.
-
Novacastrian
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:59 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Damage pics equals more comments 
- spudgunnerwryyyyy
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:54 pm
Ok im working on the damage. Im leaning towards shooting a bolt at wood.
- spudgunnerwryyyyy
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:54 pm
I realized i made a constrictive setup the second after the PVC cement set.
- joannaardway
- Corporal 5

- Posts: 949
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:57 pm
- Location: SW Hertfordshire, England, UK.
I actually quite like the paint job... I see too many camo colour schemes, and not a lot of them are actually particularly good.
It's nice to see something different.
It's nice to see something different.
Novacastrian: How about use whatever the heck you can get your hands on?
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
- jrrdw
- Moderator


- Posts: 6572
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
- Contact:
Yea Joanna, i like it to. Nice launcher, 5 lbs, thats a nice chunck of metal to be sailing through the air, could you see it flying? Or is that a dumb question. Post some video's if you can.
- spudgunnerwryyyyy
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:54 pm
Well at a 45 degree angle it goes like 80' so i will get a video. Yah u can see it fly.
- joannaardway
- Corporal 5

- Posts: 949
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:57 pm
- Location: SW Hertfordshire, England, UK.
Well, I find that things usually become hard to see at 100 m/s or more... but this is a lot larger than what I use, so you'd need to be going even faster.jrrdw wrote: could you see it flying? Or is that a dumb question.
So that would be 20,000J of kinetic energy or so to make it "invisible". At a decent 20% efficency, that becomes 100,000 J of chamber energy.
And that would need a 11 gallon chamber at 300 psi to provide that amount of energy. But for the actual chamber size, you'd need over 5000 psi and a 7 foot barrel. So, yes, it would be a little optimistic to get it so that it wasn't visible in flight.
Novacastrian: How about use whatever the heck you can get your hands on?
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
- jrrdw
- Moderator


- Posts: 6572
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
- Contact:
Well, hehe, thats a lot of figuring there Joanna! So Spudgunner. Can you mod it to those specs or not?joannaardway wrote:Well, I find that things usually become hard to see at 100 m/s or more... but this is a lot larger than what I use, so you'd need to be going even faster.jrrdw wrote: could you see it flying? Or is that a dumb question.
So that would be 20,000J of kinetic energy or so to make it "invisible". At a decent 20% efficency, that becomes 100,000 J of chamber energy.
And that would need a 11 gallon chamber at 300 psi to provide that amount of energy. But for the actual chamber size, you'd need over 5000 psi and a 7 foot barrel. So, yes, it would be a little optimistic to get it so that it wasn't visible in flight.
where do you atatch the barell, i realy dont get it.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 24 Replies
- 10332 Views
-
Last post by MrCrowley
-
- 1 Replies
- 1998 Views
-
Last post by Agent Orange
-
- 17 Replies
- 9802 Views
-
Last post by Reactor4
-
- 3 Replies
- 1333 Views
-
Last post by psycix
-
- 7 Replies
- 4060 Views
-
Last post by Gun Freak


