Difference between revisions of "Talk:Supah-Valve"
Shownomercy (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | == OMG == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is this really a good idea? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == OMGWTFBBQ == | ||
| + | Information should be available and tonymann22 also thought it was a good idea. | ||
| + | It also shows the correct way a piston valve should be constructed. | ||
| + | Lastly, it shows that the Supah is not only beautiful on the outside, but on the inside as well. | ||
| + | Questions? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Leave It== | ||
| + | It's fine, the only real place you don't want this sort of info is on the SpudTech site it's self, since that is "the home of the valve" you could say. | ||
| + | --[[User:PCGUY|PCGUY]] 03:29, 17 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:29, 17 July 2006
OMG
Is this really a good idea?
OMGWTFBBQ
Information should be available and tonymann22 also thought it was a good idea. It also shows the correct way a piston valve should be constructed. Lastly, it shows that the Supah is not only beautiful on the outside, but on the inside as well. Questions?
Leave It
It's fine, the only real place you don't want this sort of info is on the SpudTech site it's self, since that is "the home of the valve" you could say. --PCGUY 03:29, 17 July 2006 (EDT)
