Difference between revisions of "Talk:Combustion process"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think the current incarnation of this is what we really want or what it was intended to be. | I don't think the current incarnation of this is what we really want or what it was intended to be. | ||
I'm thinking we want something more along the lines of a discription of <i>how</i> the flames spread... kindof a 'therory' artical. --[[User:Boilingleadbath|boilingleadbath]] 21 October 2005 21:27 (CDT) | I'm thinking we want something more along the lines of a discription of <i>how</i> the flames spread... kindof a 'therory' artical. --[[User:Boilingleadbath|boilingleadbath]] 21 October 2005 21:27 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Yes that's what I meant when I made the link - about the chemical reactions, energy/heat/pressure, reaction rate, flame fronts etc. What's here now is already described rougly in the [[combustion cannon]] article (which also could use some work, as of now it's mostly a copy of the Wikipedia entry). --[[User:GalFisk|GalFisk]] 22 October 2005 02:06 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:06, 22 October 2005
I don't think the current incarnation of this is what we really want or what it was intended to be. I'm thinking we want something more along the lines of a discription of how the flames spread... kindof a 'therory' artical. --boilingleadbath 21 October 2005 21:27 (CDT)
- Yes that's what I meant when I made the link - about the chemical reactions, energy/heat/pressure, reaction rate, flame fronts etc. What's here now is already described rougly in the combustion cannon article (which also could use some work, as of now it's mostly a copy of the Wikipedia entry). --GalFisk 22 October 2005 02:06 (CDT)
