Max Pressure in a Hybrid
-
- Private 4
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:34 pm
Does anyone know what max tested mix in a hybrid has been?
I've seen that people have done 4x mixes without ammo...but has anything higher been done?
I've seen that people have done 4x mixes without ammo...but has anything higher been done?
- saladtossser
- Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:40 am
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
for max pressure, go to
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=231
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=231
"whoa... I thought pimpmann was black..."-pyromanic13
-
- Private 4
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:34 pm
I actaully saw this article when i was looking for for an answer earlier...
i know that is says
i know that is says
andThese guns can reach and exceed 300psi when firing
but im just curious as to the highest mix that's been succesfully used, not the pressures that it should handleit should have held 350psi easily
- HAYLO_Stealer
- Private 4
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:02 am
- Location: USA, TAMPA, FLORIDA
wow talk about what should be illegal not sayinf i magainst it. I mage firing batteries that break sound barrier at milita. (holy crap he j8st took down a bomber or a blawk hawk)
great


-
- Private 4
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:34 pm
Ok, sweet! Any idea how his gun held up to it?spudshot wrote:spudinator has fired up to a 5x mix i believe, he broke the sound barrier on that shot too
I really have no idea what this was meant to say, and damnit...my "crappy typing to English" translator is busted.HAYLO_Stealer wrote:wow talk about what should be illegal not sayinf i magainst it. I mage firing batteries that break sound barrier at milita. (holy crap he j8st took down a bomber or a blawk hawk)![]()
great
anyone care to translate?
- iamthewalrus
- Corporal
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:28 pm
- Location: Iowa (SO BORING!!)
Translation: Wow talk about what sould be illegal, not saying im aginst it, imagin firing batteries that break the sound barrier at the military. (holy crap he just took down a bomber or a black hawk)
great.
as for how the gun held up, it was most likly made of metal, i havent seen the gun but i cant imagin pvc holding a 5x mix.


as for how the gun held up, it was most likly made of metal, i havent seen the gun but i cant imagin pvc holding a 5x mix.
i got connections with the modfia, watch who ur talkin to noob.
talk to me on AIM at iamthwalrus3
talk to me on AIM at iamthwalrus3
- iamthewalrus
- Corporal
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:28 pm
- Location: Iowa (SO BORING!!)
wow, what was the chamber diameter, i jsut cant see pvc holding 5x mix (sry for going off topic)
i got connections with the modfia, watch who ur talkin to noob.
talk to me on AIM at iamthwalrus3
talk to me on AIM at iamthwalrus3
-
- Private 4
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:34 pm
well you never know...Sch80 is pretty darn tough! But then again, looking at this table i just foundiamthewalrus wrote:wow, what was the chamber diameter, i jsut cant see pvc holding 5x mix (sry for going off topic)
1/2 -509
3/4 -413
1 -378
1 1/4 -312
1 1/2 -282
2 -243
2 1/2 -255
3 -225
It looks like it would have to be a pretty small chamber to hold that much pressure, and then you have to take into consideration the burst disk that was used...would have had to been one hell of a tough disk...
anyways, feel free to clear up my doubts!
Better yet, lets get Spudinator to reply to this =)
oh and Iamthewalrus, thanks for the translation...even though that guy's response probably cost me 10 or 15 IQ points...
-
- Private 4
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:34 pm
Woops my bad..Firefox lagged and i hit Submit twice for a double-post..
zvallance1 wrote:well you never know...Sch80 is pretty darn tough! But then again, looking at this table i just foundiamthewalrus wrote:wow, what was the chamber diameter, i jsut cant see pvc holding 5x mix (sry for going off topic)
1/2 -509
3/4 -413
1 -378
1 1/4 -312
1 1/2 -282
2 -243
2 1/2 -255
3 -225
dont forget 4 inch pipe! 220 psiw, this table looks like its all for sch. 40 pipe too, take into consideration that the pipe is rated for water pressure not air, and that sch 80. holds more pressure
-
- Private 4
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:34 pm
Nope, thats all for sch 80!nicholai wrote:This table looks like its all for sch. 40 pipe too, take into consideration that the pipe is rated for water pressure not air, and that sch 80. holds more pressure
hmm i think thats wrong dude
check this out
http://www.agf.gov.bc.ca/resmgmt/publis ... 0240-1.pdf
http://www.csupomona.edu/~rkumar/lis231 ... sch40t.htm
research research research.... the ratings you posted are actually lower than sch 40 pipe
the smaller pipe has a higher pressure rating because the sidewalls are thicker in comparison to the inside diameter or the volume of the pipe
check this out
http://www.agf.gov.bc.ca/resmgmt/publis ... 0240-1.pdf
http://www.csupomona.edu/~rkumar/lis231 ... sch40t.htm
research research research.... the ratings you posted are actually lower than sch 40 pipe
the smaller pipe has a higher pressure rating because the sidewalls are thicker in comparison to the inside diameter or the volume of the pipe
- Shrimphead
- Corporal
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:42 pm
Ya i have some 1/2 sch 40 and its rated to 600, and I have 3" sch 40 and it's rated to 225 or close to that. Sch 80 has to be rated for more.